Recycling is a pointless activity, it is fraught with inefficiency. Governments need to develop policies to tackle waste and other issues at source. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
Sample Response
Nowadays, the recycling process has turned to the unwarranted activity that is implemented in almost all countries. Governments should indicate an inclination to augment policies in order to cope with waste and related to tremendous issues in advance. First, the things which are recycled cannot be the same in terms of the quality. During the protracted duration, they are becoming dilapidated and detrimental that can afflict our healthy gradually. Because the recycling process arises under the chemical reactions, as an implication the substances which are utilised for aiding the procedure can mingle with the certain recycling things and generate the harmful goods that we will consume them in the future. Due to it, the governments can impose some stringent rules about the preventing of the waste or such kind of problems via the reducing of the usage of the goods, the increasing of the price of these products and so on. On the other hand, the recycling method can be very beneficial for our environment. UnfortunateIy, the mankind does not heed to rescue the milieu from the dangerous circumstance painstakingly. Thus, they throw the goods to nature which they have already used without thinking the ramifications of it. Subsequently, it contributes to the big global issue. Albeit this challenge the recycling process can nosedive the magnifying pollution in the world. At the same time, it is rather pertinent and bargain for some countries. The governments do not spend the supplementary money in order to produce the things again. Instead of it, this money can be invested in the new projects that are more essential. Taking all thing into account, it seems to me that the recycling operation has a pivotal role in the society and it ameliorates our environment. However, it is a unanimous notion that prevention is better than cure.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Fix verb and article Original: turned to the unwarranted activity Suggested revision: become an unwarranted activity Why it matters: Become is the appropriate linking verb, and an is required before the singular noun phrase.
- 2. Use direct phrasing Original: indicate an inclination to augment policies Suggested revision: strengthen policies Why it matters: The original phrasing is unnecessarily indirect and uses augment unnaturally with policies.
- 3. Repair parallel object Original: related to tremendous issues Suggested revision: other major issues Why it matters: The phrase must be parallel with waste as another object of cope with.
- 4. Remove unnecessary article Original: terms of the quality Suggested revision: terms of quality Why it matters: Quality is used generally here and does not require the article.
- 5. Use natural time phrase Original: During the protracted duration Suggested revision: Over time Why it matters: The original phrase is redundant and unnatural.
- 6. Use suitable aspect Original: they are becoming dilapidated Suggested revision: they become degraded Why it matters: The simple present suits a general process, and degraded describes declining material quality more accurately.
- 7. Use noun form Original: afflict our healthy Suggested revision: harm our health Why it matters: Healthy is an adjective, while the possessive our requires the noun health.
- 8. Fix process phrasing Original: arises under the chemical reactions Suggested revision: involves chemical reactions Why it matters: A process involves reactions rather than arising under them.
- 9. Use result linker Original: as an implication Suggested revision: as a result Why it matters: As a result is the correct cohesive phrase for introducing a consequence.
- 10. Fix determiner phrase Original: the certain recycling things Suggested revision: certain recycled materials Why it matters: Certain does not take the here, and recycled materials is the accurate noun phrase.
- 11. Remove repeated object Original: we will consume them Suggested revision: we will consume Why it matters: The relative pronoun that already functions as the object, so them is redundant.
- 12. Clarify reference Original: Due to it Suggested revision: For this reason Why it matters: The revised linker refers clearly to the preceding claimed consequence.
Suggested Rewrites
- turned to the unwarranted activity become an unwarranted activity
- indicate an inclination to augment policies strengthen policies
- related to tremendous issues other major issues
- terms of the quality terms of quality
- During the protracted duration Over time
- they are becoming dilapidated they become degraded
Why this response received Band 5.5
The response examines both the limitations and environmental or financial benefits of recycling, and its final view recognises the value of prevention at source. However, the argument is weakened by uncertain scientific claims, an initially ambiguous position, and language that frequently obscures the intended meaning. The priority is to state a clear qualified opinion early and support it with precise, credible explanations in separate paragraphs.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response addresses recycling and source-level prevention and reaches a relevant qualified conclusion, although its position develops unevenly and some supporting claims are implausible or insufficiently explained.
Present the qualified view in the introduction and develop each reason with a credible cause-and-effect explanation or concrete example.
Coherence and Cohesion
A broad progression from drawbacks to benefits and a conclusion is visible, but the single-block presentation and sometimes mechanical linking make the argument difficult to navigate.
Divide the response into an introduction, focused body paragraphs, and a conclusion, with each paragraph organised around one clear claim.
Lexical Resource
The response shows a fairly broad vocabulary, but frequent inappropriate collocations and imprecise choices cause strain and occasionally distort meaning.
Use familiar words accurately and check common combinations, especially when describing health effects, environmental protection, cost, and pollution reduction.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The writer attempts varied and complex structures, but frequent errors in articles, noun forms, prepositions, agreement, and clause construction reduce clarity.
Prioritise accurate sentence patterns and systematically edit article use, verb forms, and unnecessary pronouns after relative clauses.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Recycling is a pointless activity, it is fraught with inefficiency. Governments need to develop policies to tackle waste and other issues at source. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.