Electric vehicles are far less damaging to the environment when compared to gasoline cars. This is why governments all around the world should promote the manufacturing and use of electric cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The comparison between electric vehicles (EVs) and gasoline cars reveals the significantly lower environmental footprint of EVs, hence, many people advocate for the manufacturing and promoting of electric cars by the governments. This essay supports the idea that governments worldwide should actively endorse the production and adoption of electric cars due to their undeniable benefits in reducing environmental harm.
One compelling reason to support the promotion of electric cars is their significantly lower carbon emissions compared to gasoline vehicles. EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, thus reducing air pollution and mitigating the adverse effects on air quality. For instance, studies indicate that the adoption of electric cars could significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, thereby combating climate change and its detrimental consequences on the environment. It would replace gasoline-driven cars - which pollute the environment and accelerate global warming.
Moreover, the shift towards electric vehicles aligns with the quest for sustainable energy sources. Electric cars can be powered by renewable energy, such as solar or wind power, further reducing their environmental impact. For example, the utilisation of clean energy to charge EVs contributes to the decarbonization of the transportation sector, promoting a greener and more sustainable future. Encouraging the widespread adoption of EVs can significantly contribute to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly transportation system, essential for combating climate change and preserving the planet for future generations.
In conclusion, advocating for the manufacturing and utilization of electric cars by governments globally is crucial in mitigating environmental degradation caused by traditional gasoline vehicles. The significant reduction in carbon emissions and the potential for reliance on renewable energy sources highlight the paramount importance of transitioning towards electric vehicles.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Fix clause boundary Original: EVs, hence, many Suggested revision: EVs; hence, many Why it matters: A semicolon is required before the conjunctive adverb joining two independent clauses.
- 2. Use parallel nouns Original: manufacturing and promoting Suggested revision: manufacture and promotion Why it matters: The coordinated objects of “for” should use parallel noun forms.
- 3. Remove generic article Original: by the governments Suggested revision: by governments Why it matters: No article is needed when referring to governments generally.
- 4. Avoid absolute claim Original: undeniable Suggested revision: substantial Why it matters: “Substantial” conveys strength without presenting the benefits as beyond dispute.
- 5. Fix consequence preposition Original: on Suggested revision: for Why it matters: The noun “consequences” takes “for” when identifying who or what is affected.
- 6. Use correct dash Original: cars - which Suggested revision: cars—which Why it matters: An unspaced em dash, not a spaced hyphen, introduces this parenthetical clause.
- 7. Complete relative clause Original: system, essential for combating Suggested revision: system, which is essential for combating Why it matters: The added relative clause clearly links “essential” to the transportation system.
- 8. Reduce overstatement Original: the paramount importance Suggested revision: the importance Why it matters: “Paramount” is unnecessary because the sentence already strongly emphasizes the transition.
- 9. Sentence rewrite Original: It would replace gasoline-driven cars - which pollute the environment and accelerate global warming. Suggested revision: Widespread adoption of EVs would replace gasoline-powered cars, which pollute the environment and accelerate global warming. Why it matters: The rewrite supplies a clear referent for “It” and uses correct punctuation.
- 10. Consolidate repeated benefit Suggested revision: Combine the final two sentences so the renewable-energy example leads once to the paragraph's sustainability outcome. Why it matters: Both sentences currently restate a greener, more sustainable transport future in similar terms.
Suggested Rewrites
- EVs, hence, many EVs; hence, many
- manufacturing and promoting manufacture and promotion
- by the governments by governments
- undeniable substantial
- on for
- cars - which cars—which
Why this response received Band 8.0
The essay presents an unequivocal position and develops two coherent environmental reasons for government promotion of electric vehicles: reduced tailpipe emissions and compatibility with renewable energy. Its strongest features are precise topic vocabulary and clear paragraph progression. The main limitation is repetition of sustainability claims and limited explanation of how governments should support manufacturing and adoption, so the highest-priority improvement is to add a concrete policy mechanism and qualify the benefits by electricity source.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The position is clear and the two central environmental reasons are relevant and developed, though support remains general and government action is not explored concretely.
Add a specific policy such as purchase incentives, charging infrastructure, or clean-energy standards and explain how it would increase adoption.
Coherence and Cohesion
A clear introduction, two focused body paragraphs, and a concise conclusion create strong logical progression, despite some repeated claims about sustainability.
End the renewable-energy paragraph after the mechanism is explained rather than restating the wider environmental benefit twice.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with effective use of environmental footprint, tailpipe emissions, decarbonization, and renewable energy.
Reduce repetition of significantly and sustainable, and use promote the manufacture and adoption rather than manufacturing and promoting by governments.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex structures is used with strong control, though the opening contains a comma splice and one pronoun reference is unclear.
Separate the opening clauses cleanly and replace It would replace gasoline-driven cars with Wider EV adoption would displace gasoline-powered vehicles.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Electric vehicles are far less damaging to the environment when compared to gasoline cars. This is why governments all around the world should promote the manufacturing and use of electric cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.