Do you think that school newspaper should be given the absolute free speech with no censorship from faculty advisors? You should

Censorship of school newspapers 1causes controversyinvites controversies across the world in this modern era. Though many people 2oppose faculty editingvoice the opinion against the faculty editing in student newsletters, 3I believe thatmy two cents is teachers’ censorship of school newspaper is a healthy practice.

One of the obvious reasons is that 4students' opinionsstudent's 5opinions may be poorly informedopinions are amateur, on many occasions, and it might convey the wrong message to other students. To be more precise, school pupils are vulnerable to what they see and hear. If an inappropriate message is conveyed to them, that will 6have serious consequences for themcause serious consequences among them. Furthermore, if students get these wrong or biased messages regularly the whole society will be affected drastically as they are going to drive the society in the future. So, 7experienced faculty membersa matured faculty monitoring the content and authenticity of school newspapers would be a far better alternative. Apart from that, the faculty advisors can help to 8addresshit the nail on the head about any controversial issues 9and improve the final publicationand which will bear better fruit. The recent court order in the United States regarding a school newspaper issue 10demonstrated clearlycrystal cleared that faculty supervision in student newsletter articles is the best 11approachepitome.

Another reason to support my opinion is that the school newspaper 13reviewed by a faculty adviserunder the scanner of a faculty brings about the substantial reduction of legal issues. 14In other words, many student opinions, such as about alcoholism and teenage pregnancy are against the national law and order and that may cause communal unrests. A teacher's opinion before publishing those 15review immensely helpsopinions immensely help to avoid potential legal problems. Needless to say, student's opinions about any issues get huge public attention if it is 16published without editorial reviewpublished without wild and woolly. Teachers headed editorial body rose lots of valuable opinions through the students' magazine without harming legal system of the country among Japanese schools are best examples. Newspapers and magazines in school need teacher’s supervision not only to avoid controversy but also to improve the overall quality of the content.

18However, an army of the people claims that the faculty involvement in students’ creativity is unethical. 2019Perhaps it may be truePerhaps it may true to some extent but while viewed in a large picture it is related to students’ safety and learning, 21limited editorial intervention is justifiableclip the wing is justifiable.

Put it in a nutshell, faculty involvement in school magazine helps to channel students’ talent in a healthy way. Necessary censorship 23brings important issues to lightbrings about to blow many issues and put forward excellent solutions to combat many social problems in a healthy manner. On top of that, an experienced helping hand supports the students to pump new ideas to society without breaching the laws.