Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Sample Response
In today's globalised world, many highly skilled professionals, including doctors, IT professionals and engineers, seek to work in other countries for various reasons. While some argue that they should be required to work in the country where they did their training, others believe they should be free to work in any country they choose. This essay examines both views arguing in favour of the latter view that suggests that those professionals should have the freedom to choose where they want to work.
Proponents of the skilled professionals working in the country where they were educated and trained form their view that they have natural obligations to serve the nation that spend a considerable amount of money and effort to educate and train them. This way they repay the nation and show their gratitude. Moreover, if those professionals leave their home country and migrate to developed nations, the brain drain crisis will worsen making a vacuum for skilled professionals in developing countries further accelerating their economic and social despairs.
On the other hand, those who support allowing skilled professionals to decide where they wish to work say that doing so promotes the exchange of knowledge and skills. They keep arguing that by working in different countries, professionals can gain exposure to different cultures and ways of working, allowing them to learn new techniques and best practices that they can bring back to their home country. This can ultimately lead to better quality services and products for everyone. For instance, Indian IT professionals are renowned worldwide for their technical skills and expertise. Many of these professionals choose to work in foreign countries like the United States, where they can work alongside top-class engineers and developers, learn new techniques, and gain invaluable experience. When they return to India, they can apply their new knowledge and skills to improve the quality of work in the Indian IT industry, leading to better services and increased competitiveness in the global market. Another reason why skilled professionals should be free to work in any country they choose is that it can benefit the global economy. When professionals are able to work in countries where their skills are in high demand, they can help to boost the economy of that country as well as send back money to their home country.
In conclusion, I believe that talented and highly-skilled professionals, such as doctors, and software engineers should be free to work in any country they wish. This promotes the exchange of knowledge and skills and benefits the global economy while ensuring that they can contribute to their respective fields more effectively.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Separate the clause Original: views arguing Suggested revision: views, arguing Why it matters: A comma is needed before the participle clause describing the essay's argument.
- 2. Remove awkward repetition Original: latter view that suggests that Suggested revision: latter view, which holds that Why it matters: This wording avoids repeating “view” and “suggests” while preserving the claim.
- 3. Repair the noun phrase Original: Proponents of the skilled professionals working Suggested revision: Proponents of requiring skilled professionals to work Why it matters: The original construction does not grammatically identify what the proponents support.
- 4. Use the right collocation Original: form their view that Suggested revision: base their view on the idea that Why it matters: Views are based on an idea rather than formed that an idea is true.
- 5. Match subject and verb Original: nation that spend Suggested revision: nation that spends Why it matters: The singular subject “nation” requires the singular verb “spends”.
- 6. Clarify the link Original: This way Suggested revision: In this way, Why it matters: The linking phrase requires the preposition and a following comma in this position.
- 7. Express the consequence clearly Original: worsen making a vacuum for skilled professionals in developing countries further accelerating Suggested revision: worsen, creating a shortage of skilled professionals in developing countries and further accelerating Why it matters: “A shortage of professionals” is the natural expression, and the revision coordinates the two consequences clearly.
- 8. Use the correct noun Original: economic and social despairs Suggested revision: economic and social hardship Why it matters: “Hardship” accurately denotes adverse economic and social conditions, whereas “despairs” does not fit this context.
- 9. Use a neutral transition Original: They keep arguing that Suggested revision: They also argue that Why it matters: “Also argue” adds the point directly without implying repeated insistence.
- 10. Remove the hyphen Original: highly-skilled professionals Suggested revision: highly skilled professionals Why it matters: An adverb ending in “-ly” is not hyphenated with the adjective it modifies.
- 11. Remove the extra comma Original: doctors, and software engineers Suggested revision: doctors and software engineers Why it matters: A comma should not separate the two final items joined by “and” in this short list.
- 12. Use a precise obligation Original: natural obligations Suggested revision: a moral obligation Why it matters: The singular phrase more precisely expresses the duty to serve the country that funded the training.
Suggested Rewrites
- views arguing views, arguing
- latter view that suggests that latter view, which holds that
- Proponents of the skilled professionals working Proponents of requiring skilled professionals to work
- form their view that base their view on the idea that
- nation that spend nation that spends
- This way In this way,
Why this response received Band 7.5
The response addresses both views directly, maintains a clear position, and supports the preferred view with a relevant, extended example. Its main limitation is uneven presentation: the supporting side occupies an overlong paragraph, while several awkward collocations and sentence-level slips reduce precision. The highest-priority improvement is to balance and divide the development more deliberately while proofreading for natural word combinations and grammatical agreement.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Detailed feedback by IELTS writing criterion after the annotated essay.
Task Response
Both views are addressed, the writer's position is clear throughout, and the main ideas receive relevant explanation and support.
Develop the obligation argument as fully as the freedom argument so that the discussion feels more evenly considered.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response progresses logically through a clear four-paragraph structure, though the long third paragraph becomes overloaded with several distinct points.
Separate the extended example from the global-economy point and use more precise referencing between those ideas.
Lexical Resource
A broad vocabulary supports nuanced discussion, but awkward combinations such as references to a national vacuum or social despairs occasionally weaken naturalness.
Prioritise accurate collocations and idiomatic phrasing when expressing abstract social and economic consequences.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A varied range of complex structures is used successfully, although agreement, punctuation, and sentence-attachment errors recur in places.
Proofread complex sentences for subject-verb agreement and add punctuation where participial clauses follow complete statements.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.