In some areas of the US, a ‘curfew’ is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. What is your opinion about this?

Sample Response

The imposition of a curfew for teenagers in certain areas of the US has sparked a debate regarding its necessity and effectiveness. While some argue that curfews provide safety and discipline for teenagers, I respectfully disagree with this viewpoint. In this essay, I will present arguments against the implementation of curfews and illustrate why they may not be the most effective approach to addressing the concerns related to teenage activities.

Imposing a curfew on teenagers restricts their personal freedom and curtails their ability to engage in activities that contribute to their personal growth and development. Teenagers should be given the opportunity to explore their interests, develop independence, and learn essential life skills. By imposing a curfew, we limit their chances to participate in extracurricular activities, socialise with peers, or engage in community events that occur beyond the curfew hours. For example, a teenager with a passion for music may be part of a local band that regularly performs at gigs in the evening. Imposing a curfew would prevent them from pursuing their musical aspirations and sharing their talent with the community.

Moreover, curfews often fail to address the root causes of the perceived problems they aim to solve. The reasons behind teenage delinquency, such as substance abuse, gang involvement, or risky behaviours, cannot be solely attributed to the time they spend outside at night. These issues require a comprehensive approach that focuses on education, mentorship, and support systems. Instead of restricting teenagers' freedom through curfews, resources should be allocated to provide guidance, counselling, and educational programs to address the underlying issues and help teenagers make informed choices.

In conclusion, the imposition of curfews on teenagers is a restrictive measure that limits personal freedom and may not effectively address the underlying issues it seeks to resolve. Instead of relying on curfews, it is important to focus on comprehensive strategies that address the root causes of teenage delinquency and promote responsible decision-making.

IELTS Writing Correction

  • 1. Use a concise phrase Original: The imposition of a curfew for teenagers Suggested revision: The imposition of teenage curfews Why it matters: The compact noun phrase fits the essay's general discussion of curfews.
  • 2. Align the reference Original: regarding its necessity and effectiveness Suggested revision: over their necessity and effectiveness Why it matters: The plural reference agrees with the general topic of teenage curfews.
  • 3. Improve the collocation Original: provide safety Suggested revision: enhance safety Why it matters: Enhance safety is a more natural collocation for describing a policy's intended effect.
  • 4. Remove unnecessary formality Original: respectfully disagree Suggested revision: disagree Why it matters: The adverb is unnecessary in an analytical essay and slightly weakens the direct position.
  • 5. Prefer concise wording Original: implementation of curfews Suggested revision: use of curfews Why it matters: The shorter phrase conveys the same policy action without nominal heaviness.
  • 6. Use a direct phrase Original: concerns related to teenage activities Suggested revision: concerns about teenagers' activities Why it matters: The revision is more concise and identifies whose activities are meant.
  • 7. Remove redundancy Original: personal growth and development Suggested revision: personal development Why it matters: Growth and development overlap in meaning here.
  • 8. Use concise wording Original: given the opportunity Suggested revision: allowed Why it matters: The single verb preserves the meaning and makes the sentence more direct.
  • 9. Improve the collocation Original: chances to participate Suggested revision: opportunities to participate Why it matters: Opportunities is the more natural noun for access to beneficial activities.
  • 10. Clarify the timing Original: beyond the curfew hours Suggested revision: after the curfew begins Why it matters: The revision states the relevant time restriction more clearly.
  • 11. Link activities to growth Suggested revision: Make the connection between the listed evening activities and the earlier claim about personal development explicit. Why it matters: This would strengthen progression from the general claim to its practical illustrations.
  • 12. Bridge to the example Suggested revision: Use a short transition to show that the local-band example illustrates the preceding list of restricted opportunities. Why it matters: The example is relevant, but its relationship to the general list could be signposted more clearly.

Suggested Rewrites

  • The imposition of a curfew for teenagers The imposition of teenage curfews
  • regarding its necessity and effectiveness over their necessity and effectiveness
  • provide safety enhance safety
  • respectfully disagree disagree
  • implementation of curfews use of curfews
  • concerns related to teenage activities concerns about teenagers' activities
Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 8.0

The essay presents a consistent position, develops two distinct objections to curfews, and supports them with a concrete example and a plausible alternative policy. The main limitation is that it gives little attention to the stated adult-accompaniment exception or the strongest safety rationale for curfews. Addressing that counterargument directly would make the case more nuanced and persuasive without weakening the clear stance.

Band score breakdown

IELTS Writing Criteria Scores

Detailed feedback by IELTS writing criterion after the annotated essay.

TR

Task Response

8.0
Feedback

The response answers the opinion question directly and develops relevant arguments about personal freedom and the underlying causes of delinquency.

Next step

Acknowledge and rebut the safety case and the adult-accompaniment exception to demonstrate fuller engagement with the specific policy described.

CC

Coherence and Cohesion

8.0
Feedback

Ideas are organised into focused paragraphs and progress smoothly from the position to two reasons and an alternative approach.

Next step

Strengthen the link between the two body arguments by showing how preventive support better protects teenagers while preserving legitimate freedoms.

LR

Lexical Resource

8.0
Feedback

The essay uses a broad and precise academic vocabulary, including effective language for restriction, development, and social policy.

Next step

Reduce repetition of ‘curfews’, ‘teenagers’, and ‘underlying issues’ through selective referencing rather than unnecessary synonym replacement.

GRA

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

8.0
Feedback

Complex sentences and subordinate structures are handled with strong control, and grammatical errors are rare.

Next step

Maintain this accuracy while introducing slightly more varied sentence rhythms, particularly in passages containing repeated infinitive structures.

Put the feedback to work

Use this task for your next draft

Feedback is more useful when you actively apply it in a draft, rather than only recognising improvements on the page.

Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.

The question will be loaded automatically.