Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The notion that children brought up in families with less financial means are better prepared for life than those from affluent families is a complex and nuanced topic. While there are certain merits to this argument, it is crucial to recognize the multifaceted nature of a child’s development and the various factors that contribute to their preparedness for life.
One compelling aspect supporting this idea is the development of resilience and grit in children facing financial challenges. Growing up in an environment with limited resources necessitates adaptability and coping skills, which can be valuable assets in adulthood. For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by psychologists at Harvard University revealed that individuals from economically disadvantaged backgrounds demonstrated higher levels of resilience in the face of adversity compared to their wealthier counterparts.
Moreover, the importance of instilling a strong work ethic in children cannot be overstated. In financially constrained households, children often witness the dedication and hard work required to make ends meet. This firsthand experience can cultivate a robust work ethic that propels them toward success in various aspects of life. Research by the National Bureau of Economic Research has indicated a positive correlation between early exposure to a strong work ethic and later career achievements.
However, it is essential to acknowledge the potential limitations and disadvantages of growing up in economically deprived environments. Limited access to quality education, healthcare, and extracurricular activities can impede a child’s overall development and hinder their future opportunities. It is crucial to strike a delicate balance between fostering resilience and providing the necessary resources for a child’s holistic growth.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments supporting the idea that children from less affluent families may be better prepared for life, it is imperative to consider the broader spectrum of factors influencing a child’s development. Balancing resilience with essential resources ensures a more comprehensive and equitable approach to preparing children for the challenges of life.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use a concise noun Original: complex and nuanced topic Suggested revision: complex issue Why it matters: This is more concise and natural in an academic introduction.
- 2. Improve collocation Original: certain merits to this argument Suggested revision: some merit in this argument Why it matters: The noun 'merit' more naturally takes 'in' in this expression.
- 3. Clarify the meaning Original: preparedness for life Suggested revision: readiness for adult life Why it matters: This specifies the kind of life preparation being discussed.
- 4. Choose a precise noun Original: One compelling aspect supporting this idea Suggested revision: One compelling argument supporting this view Why it matters: An argument, rather than an aspect, supports a position.
- 5. Express development clearly Original: necessitates adaptability and coping skills Suggested revision: requires children to develop adaptability and coping skills Why it matters: The revision makes clear that the environment prompts children to develop these qualities.
- 6. Use a suitable noun Original: assets Suggested revision: qualities Why it matters: Adaptability and coping skills are more naturally described as qualities.
- 7. Avoid a stock phrase Original: cannot be overstated Suggested revision: is considerable Why it matters: This states the importance more directly and precisely.
- 8. Use measured wording Original: propels them toward success in various aspects of life Suggested revision: helps them succeed in various areas of life Why it matters: The revision avoids overstating the effect while preserving the claim.
- 9. Use present simple Original: Research by the National Bureau of Economic Research has indicated Suggested revision: Research by the National Bureau of Economic Research indicates Why it matters: The present simple is more direct for reporting a general research finding.
- 10. Remove redundancy Original: potential limitations and disadvantages Suggested revision: potential disadvantages Why it matters: The two nouns overlap in meaning here, so one is sufficient.
- 11. Use natural collocation Original: spectrum Suggested revision: range Why it matters: 'Range of factors' is the more natural academic collocation.
- 12. Sentence rewrite Original: For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by psychologists at Harvard University revealed that individuals from economically disadvantaged backgrounds demonstrated higher levels of resilience in the face of adversity compared to their wealthier counterparts. Suggested revision: For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by psychologists at Harvard University revealed that individuals from economically disadvantaged backgrounds were more resilient in the face of adversity than their wealthier counterparts. Why it matters: The original compares levels of resilience with people, so the comparative structure needs parallel terms.
Suggested Rewrites
- complex and nuanced topic complex issue
- certain merits to this argument some merit in this argument
- preparedness for life readiness for adult life
- One compelling aspect supporting this idea One compelling argument supporting this view
- necessitates adaptability and coping skills requires children to develop adaptability and coping skills
- assets qualities
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response is strongest in its mature, well-organised discussion of how resilience and work ethic can benefit less affluent children, supported by relevant explanations. Its main limitation is that the exact degree of agreement remains somewhat implicit and the counterargument is less fully developed than the supporting case. State the qualified position more explicitly and examine how resource disadvantages affect overall preparedness in equal depth.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response fully addresses the proposition through a clear, nuanced position and well-developed supporting and opposing considerations.
Make the precise extent of agreement explicit in the introduction and sustain equal depth when weighing the disadvantages.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas progress logically through focused paragraphs, with cohesive devices used naturally and unobtrusively.
Strengthen the transition into the counterargument by explicitly linking resource deprivation to the earlier claims about preparedness.
Lexical Resource
A wide and precise vocabulary conveys nuanced ideas effectively, with only occasional conventional phrasing.
Replace a few stock academic expressions with more specific wording tied directly to childhood preparedness.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A broad range of complex structures is handled accurately, and sentences remain consistently clear.
Refine sentence rhythm by varying the openings of longer analytical sentences while maintaining the same accuracy.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.