It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects, therefore, should not worry about producing buildings as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Sample Response
The purpose and aesthetics of buildings have long been debated in architectural circles. Some believe that functionality of a building should always outweigh beauty. This essay will disagree with the opinion by highlighting the importance of a building's purpose as well as aesthetics and argue that architects should strive to create structures that harmoniously balance both aspects.
To begin with, the functionality of a building is important, but the design and visual appeal are no less essential. The primary purpose of any construction may be to fulfil a specific function, whether it is a residential space, office complex, or educational institution, but if it looks ugly, it becomes the eye soar in an area inviting criticism. While functionality ensures that the building serves the needs of its occupants efficiently and effectively, the appealing looks make it more demanding to tenants and visitors. For instance, a school must prioritise functionality to facilitate students' all-rounded educational needs while also being captivating to offer a conducive educational environment.
While functionality is essential, aesthetics play a crucial role in creating inspiring and memorable spaces. Aesthetically pleasing buildings contribute to the cultural identity of a place and can uplift the spirits of those who encounter them. For example, iconic landmarks like the Eiffel Tower in Paris or the Sydney Opera House are not only functional but also celebrated as symbols of architectural beauty and national pride. Therefore, the most successful architectural designs are those that seamlessly integrate form and function. Architects should not view functionality and aesthetics as mutually exclusive, but rather as complementary aspects of the design process. For instance, the Burj Khalifa in Dubai is not only the world's tallest building but also an architectural masterpiece that blends functionality with elegant aesthetics.
From the discussion, we can conclude that it is erroneous to claim that a building's purpose is more critical than its aesthetics. A successful architectural design should achieve a harmonious balance between functionality and beauty. Buildings that serve their intended purposes while also embodying artistic expression not only meet the practical needs of society but also inspire and enrich the lives of people who experience them.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Add the definite article Original: that functionality of a building Suggested revision: that the functionality of a building Why it matters: The specified functionality of a building requires the definite article.
- 2. Use the present tense Original: This essay will disagree Suggested revision: This essay disagrees Why it matters: The present simple is more direct when stating the essay's position.
- 3. Restore verb parallelism Original: and argue that architects Suggested revision: and will argue that architects Why it matters: Adding 'will' makes 'argue' parallel with the earlier verb phrase.
- 4. Name the object directly Original: construction Suggested revision: building Why it matters: 'Building' is more precise than the process-oriented noun 'construction' here.
- 5. Keep the list parallel Original: a residential space, office complex, or educational institution Suggested revision: a residential space, an office complex, or an educational institution Why it matters: Each singular countable item in the list needs an article.
- 6. Use the correct noun Original: the eye soar Suggested revision: an eyesore Why it matters: The noun for an unattractive object is the single word 'eyesore'.
- 7. Use a formal noun phrase Original: the appealing looks Suggested revision: an appealing appearance Why it matters: 'An appealing appearance' is the natural formal expression for visual attractiveness.
- 8. Use the intended adjective Original: demanding Suggested revision: attractive Why it matters: 'Demanding' means requiring effort and does not express desirability.
- 9. Remove the unnecessary comma Original: mutually exclusive, but rather as Suggested revision: mutually exclusive but rather as Why it matters: No comma is needed between the paired complements 'not ... but rather'.
- 10. Avoid a redundant phrase Original: aesthetics Suggested revision: design Why it matters: 'Elegant design' states the intended visual quality more naturally.
- 11. Sentence rewrite Original: For instance, a school must prioritise functionality to facilitate students' all-rounded educational needs while also being captivating to offer a conducive educational environment. Suggested revision: For instance, a school must prioritise functionality to meet students' broad educational needs while also being visually appealing enough to provide a conducive educational environment. Why it matters: The rewrite corrects three unnatural collocations while preserving the example's intended contrast.
Suggested Rewrites
- that functionality of a building that the functionality of a building
- This essay will disagree This essay disagrees
- and argue that architects and will argue that architects
- construction building
- a residential space, office complex, or educational institution a residential space, an office complex, or an educational institution
- the eye soar an eyesore
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response’s strongest feature is its consistently argued position that successful architecture should integrate practical function with aesthetic value, reinforced by relevant examples and clear social and cultural consequences. Its main limitation is a small number of inaccurate expressions amid otherwise sophisticated language; the highest-priority improvement is to refine those collocations and make the distinction between visual attractiveness and deeper artistic value even more explicit.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response directly rejects the proposition, develops a nuanced alternative, and supports it fully with relevant explanations and architectural examples.
Clarify how artistic value benefits ordinary buildings as well as iconic landmarks to make the position even more broadly applicable.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument progresses smoothly from the balanced thesis through functional and aesthetic considerations to a well-synthesised conclusion.
Tighten the transition within the second body paragraph so the landmark examples and form-and-function principle feel less repetitive.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is wide, precise, and appropriately formal overall, although a few inaccurate expressions interrupt otherwise strong control.
Correct collocations such as “eyesore,” “more attractive to tenants,” and “well-rounded educational needs.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex sentences is used flexibly and accurately, with only rare non-impeding lapses.
Polish minor article and modifier choices so long comparative and concessive structures remain consistently exact.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects, therefore, should not worry about producing buildings as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.