Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Same question Compare 2 different answers (Band 8)

Sample Response

Environmental problems are a growing concern worldwide, and there is a need to address them effectively to ensure a sustainable future. Some people argue that these issues should be dealt with on a global level, while others believe that individual countries should take responsibility for their own environmental problems. In my opinion, both approaches are necessary to tackle environmental issues effectively.

On the one hand, addressing environmental problems globally can produce better results. Cooperation between countries can lead to the sharing of knowledge, resources, and technology. For example, the Montreal Protocol is a global agreement signed by countries to reduce the use of substances that deplete the ozone layer. This agreement has been successful in protecting the ozone layer and reducing the impact of climate change. Furthermore, global cooperation can lead to the establishment of international standards and regulations for environmental protection, which can ensure that all countries are working towards the same goals.

On the other hand, individual countries have a responsibility to address their own environmental problems. Each country has unique environmental challenges, and local solutions may be more effective. For instance, Costa Rica has implemented a successful reforestation program that has helped to protect its natural resources and reduce carbon emissions. The program was tailored to the country's specific needs and took into account its unique environmental conditions. Similarly, China has taken steps to reduce air pollution by implementing strict regulations on industries and promoting the use of clean energy. In addition, individual countries can act as leaders in addressing environmental problems, inspiring others to follow suit. For example, Sweden has set ambitious goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and has made significant progress in achieving them. Its success in environmental protection has inspired other countries to take similar measures.

In conclusion, both global and individual approaches are necessary to address environmental problems effectively. Global cooperation can lead to the sharing of knowledge and resources, while individual countries can implement solutions tailored to their specific needs. By working together, we can ensure a sustainable future for ourselves and future generations.

IELTS Writing Correction

  • 1. Use natural preposition Original: on Suggested revision: at Why it matters: This is the more natural prepositional phrase for describing the scale of action.
  • 2. Choose precise verb Original: produce better results Suggested revision: yield more effective results Why it matters: The revised collocation expresses the outcome more precisely.
  • 3. Make wording concise Original: agreement signed by countries Suggested revision: agreement among countries Why it matters: This concise phrasing emphasizes international participation without unnecessary wording.
  • 4. Clarify regulatory scope Original: on Suggested revision: governing Why it matters: This wording makes the relationship between the rules and industries clearer.
  • 5. Use natural phrasing Original: Its success in environmental protection Suggested revision: Its success in protecting the environment Why it matters: The verbal phrase is more natural and direct here.
  • 6. Keep categories consistent Original: individual Suggested revision: national Why it matters: National accurately contrasts with global, whereas individual could refer to people rather than countries.
  • 7. Avoid repeated wording Original: ourselves Suggested revision: current Why it matters: The revision removes the awkward repetition of future while preserving the intended contrast.
  • 8. Make statement direct Original: there is a need to address them effectively Suggested revision: they require effective action Why it matters: The revision states the need for action more directly and concisely.
  • 9. Reduce repeated wording Original: both approaches are necessary to tackle environmental issues effectively Suggested revision: both approaches are necessary for tackling environmental issues Why it matters: The revision avoids repeating effectively within the introductory paragraph.
  • 10. Use concise verb Original: Cooperation between countries can lead to the sharing of Suggested revision: Cooperation between countries enables the sharing of Why it matters: Enables expresses the relationship more directly without changing the claim.
  • 11. Streamline relative clause Original: which can ensure that all countries are working towards the same goals Suggested revision: helping ensure that all countries work towards the same goals Why it matters: The participial clause is more concise and avoids an unnecessarily continuous verb form.
  • 12. Use concise infinitive Original: has helped to protect Suggested revision: has helped protect Why it matters: Help can take the bare infinitive here for a more concise construction.

Suggested Rewrites

  • on at
  • produce better results yield more effective results
  • agreement signed by countries agreement among countries
  • on governing
  • Its success in environmental protection Its success in protecting the environment
  • individual national
Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 8.0

The response fully addresses both perspectives and sustains a clear, well-supported position, with particularly strong use of relevant international and national examples. Its main limitation is some repetition of key environmental terms and a few claims that could be framed more precisely. The highest-priority improvement is to deepen the comparison between the two approaches while varying repeated vocabulary for a more incisive argument.

Band score breakdown

IELTS Writing Criteria Scores

TR

Task Response

8.0
Scoring rule

Both views and the writer's combined position are fully addressed with clear, relevant development and specific examples.

Next step

Make the relationship between national action and global coordination more explicitly comparative to sharpen the central argument.

CC

Coherence and Cohesion

8.0
Scoring rule

Ideas progress logically through well-focused paragraphs, and cohesive devices guide the reader smoothly.

Next step

Use more implicit connections between supporting points to make the progression feel even less signposted.

LR

Lexical Resource

8.0
Scoring rule

A broad and precise environmental vocabulary supports clear discussion, with only minor repetition of central terms.

Next step

Vary recurring phrases such as environmental problems and global cooperation while preserving their precise meaning.

GRA

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

8.0
Scoring rule

A wide range of complex structures is used accurately and naturally, with consistently clear sentence control.

Next step

Refine occasional long sentences by tightening subordinate clauses so that emphasis remains crisp.

Put the feedback to work

Write this task while it is fresh

Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.

IELTS Writing Task 2

Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Your response

Words0
40:00

Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.