The graph below shows the number of books bought from different sources in one European country since 2000 with a projection for 2012.
This response is estimated at Band 5.5. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
The graph illustrates the number of books bought from three sources in a European country changedhow the figure of books bought from three sources in an European country over a 12-year period between 2000 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the figure for bookshops followed aan downward trend, while the figures for supermarkets and the internet experienced growthand internet experienced growth. Over the first eight years, the number of books bought from bookshops was the largest, and the figure for the internet was initially the lowest before rising above supermarkets in 2004.the figure for supermarkets was the smallest.
With regard to supermarkets, salesit rose sharply from 140 million in 2008 to 160 million in 2012 after rising steadilybefore a wildly increasing from 130 million to 140 million over the first eight years. Meanwhile, sales via the internetAlso, the figure for internet followed an upward, yet more fluctuating trend.followed a rising, but more fluctuating. It rose steadily from 110 million to nearly 140 million between 2000 and 2004surged from 110 million to 140 million between 2000 and 2004, after which it continued increasing moderatelywiidly from 140 million in 2004 to 150 million in 2008. Over the final four years, it is projected to dropOver the last four years, it dropped to about 135 million.
By contrast, after a significantsignificantly decline from 170 million to approximately 140 million over the first eight years, matching supermarket sales at 140 million in 2008being overtaken by that for supermarkets in 2008, the number of books bought from bookshops experienced a slight risea slightly rising to about 155 million in 2012.
Why this response received Band 5.5
setup includes a clear overview and accurate data points extracted from the line graph. However, frequent grammatical errors, such as incorrect articles and faulty sentence structures, alongside inappropriate word choices like inappropriate adverbs, limit the clarity of the report. To improve, focus on mastering noun phrase constructions for describing trends and reviewing chronological sequencing in complex sentences.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Achievement
The response successfully provides a clear overall summary and accurately highlights the key features and numerical values across the period.
Ensure all trend descriptions strictly follow a clear chronological sequence to prevent reader confusion.
Coherence and Cohesion
Information is grouped into clear paragraph divisions with logical progression, though cohesion is occasionally affected by awkward phrase structures.
Use chronological transitions more naturally rather than reversing time periods within a single sentence.
Lexical Resource
While relevant vocabulary for describing trends is attempted, there are repeated errors in word choice, word formation, and spelling.
Practice using precise adverbs and verbs for trend descriptions instead of inaccurate modifiers like 'wildly'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A variety of sentence structures is attempted, but control over grammar is weak, featuring frequent errors in articles, prepositions, and word classes.
Review the correct grammar patterns for trend phrases, specifically avoiding using verbs or participial phrases where nouns are required.