The chart shows student expenditure over a three-year period in the United Kingdom.

Bar chart for an IELTS Academic Task 1 question about UK Student Expenditure, 1996–1999.

Sample Response

The chart shows the changes which took place in student spending in the United Kingdom during/over the three-year period from 1996 to 1999.

Students spent 3% less on accommodation, which fell from 23% to 20% of total expenditure, and there was a 2% decrease in spending on food, bills and household goods, which fell from 20% to 18%. At the same time course expenditure went down by 3% from 10% to 7%. Children, who constituted 1% of students’ expenditure in 1996, are not represented in 1999.

On the other hand, there was a 5% growth in spending on entertainment, which stood at 26% of total expenditure in 1996 but rose to 31% in 1999. Spending on other non-essential items and credit repayments grew by 4% to make up 16% of total expenditure. Spending on essential travel went up by 3% while non-essential travel underwent a 1% fall.

Overall, with the exception of expenditure on travel, the most significant general change was a shift from/in spending on essential items to spending on non-essential items.

IELTS Writing Correction

  • 1. Choose one preposition Original: during/over Suggested revision: over Why it matters: The slash presents editing alternatives rather than a finished expression.
  • 2. Use percentage points Original: spent 3% less on accommodation Suggested revision: allocated 3 percentage points less to accommodation Why it matters: The share falls from 23% to 20%, which is a three-percentage-point decrease.
  • 3. Use percentage points Original: a 2% decrease Suggested revision: a 2-percentage-point decrease Why it matters: A change from 20% to 18% is two percentage points, not a 2% relative decrease.
  • 4. Add introductory comma Original: At the same time Suggested revision: At the same time, Why it matters: A comma should separate this introductory linking phrase from the main clause.
  • 5. Use percentage points Original: went down by 3% Suggested revision: went down by 3 percentage points Why it matters: The movement from 10% to 7% is a change of three percentage points.
  • 6. Use percentage points Original: a 5% growth Suggested revision: a 5-percentage-point rise Why it matters: The increase from 26% to 31% is five percentage points.
  • 7. Use percentage points Original: grew by 4% Suggested revision: rose by 4 percentage points Why it matters: The other-items share moves from 12% to 16%, a four-percentage-point rise.
  • 8. Use percentage points Original: went up by 3% Suggested revision: rose by about 3 percentage points Why it matters: The chart compares percentage shares, so the absolute change should be expressed in percentage points.
  • 9. Remove editing alternative Original: shift from/in Suggested revision: shift from Why it matters: Only “from” correctly begins the contrast with the later phrase “to spending on non-essential items.”
  • 10. Sentence rewrite Original: Children, who constituted 1% of students’ expenditure in 1996, are not represented in 1999. Suggested revision: Spending on children, which accounted for 1% of total expenditure in 1996, was not represented in 1999. Why it matters: The expenditure category, rather than children themselves, accounts for the percentage shown.

Suggested Rewrites

  • during/over over
  • spent 3% less on accommodation allocated 3 percentage points less to accommodation
  • a 2% decrease a 2-percentage-point decrease
  • At the same time At the same time,
  • went down by 3% went down by 3 percentage points
  • a 5% growth a 5-percentage-point rise
Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 8.5

The response gives comprehensive and accurate coverage of the chart, grouping decreases and increases effectively and ending with a perceptive overview of the shift toward non-essential spending. Organisation and language are consistently strong. The main weakness is the presence of unresolved alternative wording marked by slashes; selecting one finished expression in each case would make the report fully polished and presentation-ready.

Band score breakdown

IELTS Writing Criteria Scores

TA

Task Achievement

9.0
Scoring rule

All expenditure categories are covered accurately, and the overview clearly identifies the central shift from essential to non-essential items.

Next step

Preserve this comprehensive selection while expressing percentage changes explicitly as percentage-point changes for maximum precision.

CC

Coherence and Cohesion

8.0
Scoring rule

The report is logically sequenced into declining and rising categories, with cohesive comparisons and a clear concluding overview.

Next step

Remove the slash-separated drafting alternatives so the progression reads as a completely finished report.

LR

Lexical Resource

8.0
Scoring rule

A wide and precise vocabulary describes changes effectively, including “constituted,” “credit repayments,” and “underwent a fall.”

Next step

Choose one final collocation wherever alternatives such as “from/in” appear rather than leaving both in the text.

GRA

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

8.0
Scoring rule

Complex sentences are handled with strong control and accurate punctuation throughout nearly the entire response.

Next step

Resolve “during/over” and “from/in” into single grammatical choices to eliminate the only conspicuous surface flaws.

Put the feedback to work

Write this task while it is fresh

Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.

IELTS Academic Writing Task 1

The chart shows student expenditure over a three-year period in the United Kingdom.

Bar chart for an IELTS Academic Task 1 question about UK Student Expenditure, 1996–1999.

Your response

Words0
20:00

Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.