Some people think it is necessary to use animals for testing medicines intended for human use. Others, however, think it is cruel to do that. Discuss both of these views and give you own opinion.
This response is estimated at Band 8.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
The question of whether animals should be used to test medicines has divided public opinion into two distinct camps. On the one hand, a large proportion of people maintain that animal testing is beneficial to human health, while opponents argue that it is cruel and inhumane to carry out medical tests on animals because animals are also living creatures. I will analyse these two opposing viewpoints before presenting my own perspective.
On the one hand, thereFirst of all, there is no denying that people have different methods to innovate and develop medicines that can treat complex diseases. For example, although recruiting human volunteers to test the effectiveness and toxicity of newly-developed medicines is feasible, it is extremely expensive. Since there are plenty of animal subjectssamples to conduct medical experiments, carrying out tests on animals is much cheaper. Additionally, animal testing can lay a solid foundation for medical innovation. Animals like chimpanzees and monkeys, which sharemonkeys which share similar biological structures and genes serve as ideal subjects for medical testing, which enables people to identifyverify the side effects of medicines, ensuring that only effective and safe medicines can enter clinical trials.
On the other hand, it is immoral to kill animals for human purposes, no matter what kinds of animals they are. Most of them are sentient beingsspecies, which can experience pain and have emotions. Testing the effectiveness of new medicines on animals tends to be detrimental to their health or even pose a serious threat to their lives. What’s more, because of the physiological differences between animals and humansdifferent body structures between animals and humans, opposite results may occur when humans take new medicines. We cannot rely on inconclusive dataunreliable test results to guarantee our safety.
From my perspective, using animals for testing is practical and necessary since it can significantly reduce the risks imposed on patients in clinical trials, contributing to the research and development of medicines. However, since animals are sentient beings which also experience pain during experiments, scientists and medical professionals are advised to regulate experimental proceduresbehaviors or develop cutting-edge technologiestechnology like computer simulation to alleviate the suffering of animals.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response presents a well-balanced discussion of both perspectives alongside a clearly stated, nuanced personal opinion that is thoroughly developed throughout the essay. Ideas flow logically with clear paragraphing, supported by sophisticated vocabulary and a wide range of accurate grammatical structures. To enhance the essay further, refining minor word choices and ensuring fully developed counter-arguments against the opposite view would elevate the overall impact.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both sides of the debate are clearly addressed with relevant supporting arguments, and a clear personal position is presented.
Directly address the counter-arguments raised in the second paragraph within your opinion paragraph to make your conclusion even more convincing.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphs are logically structured with clear topic sentences and smooth transitions throughout the essay.
Vary cohesive devices slightly more to avoid relying on standard transitional phrases like 'On the one hand' and 'On the other hand'.
Lexical Resource
A wide range of precise and natural topic-specific vocabulary is used accurately across the entire text.
Focus on subtle collocation pairings, such as replacing 'regulate experimental behaviors' with 'regulate experimental procedures'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A broad variety of complex sentence structures is used with high accuracy and minimal minor errors.
Maintain consistent punctuation control in longer complex sentences to keep clauses clearly separated.