In many countries, it is common for families to own and run their own businesses. Some people think this is the best way to run a business, while others consider this a potential source of problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Sample Response
The ownership and operation of family businesses are prevalent in many countries. While some individuals view this as an ideal approach to running a business, others perceive it as a potential source of challenges. In this essay, we will examine both perspectives and argue that while family ownership has its benefits, it may lead to inherent problems that can hinder sustainable business growth.
Supporters of family-run businesses often highlight the strong sense of unity and loyalty within these enterprises. Family members working together tend to share a deep bond and commitment to the success of the business. This cohesion can create a conducive environment for effective communication, efficient decision-making, and a shared vision for the future. For instance, "ABC Electronics," a family-run company in the UK, has maintained its reputation for decades due to the family's unwavering dedication to quality and customer satisfaction. Their strong ethical values and personalized customer service have earned them a loyal clientele, contributing to their continued success.
On the other hand, critics of family ownership cite several challenges that can arise in such enterprises. One significant issue is the potential for conflicts and disputes among family members regarding business decisions and roles. Personal dynamics and emotions may influence important choices, leading to suboptimal outcomes and inefficiencies. Moreover, nepotism and favouritism could be detrimental to the company's overall performance. In family-run businesses, qualified non-family members may be overlooked for key positions, undermining meritocracy and hindering innovation.
In my opinion, while family-run businesses can offer advantages like strong cohesion and long-term vision, I believe that they may face more significant challenges in the long run.
In conclusion, family-run businesses have their merits, including unity and commitment. However, the potential problems they face, such as conflicts and nepotism, should not be overlooked. While the family business model may work well in some cases, it may not be the best approach for achieving sustainable success in a rapidly changing business landscape.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Simplify opening phrase Original: The ownership and operation of family businesses are prevalent Suggested revision: Family ownership and management are common Why it matters: The revision states the prevalence directly and avoids the abstract pairing of ownership and operation.
- 2. Tighten challenge phrase Original: a potential source of challenges Suggested revision: a source of potential challenges Why it matters: The revision places “potential” next to what is uncertain and reads more naturally.
- 3. Avoid overstating inevitability Original: inherent problems that can hinder Suggested revision: internal problems that may hinder Why it matters: “Internal” identifies where the problems arise without implying that they are unavoidable.
- 4. Clarify shared qualities Original: a deep bond and commitment Suggested revision: deep bonds and a shared commitment Why it matters: The plural noun and added determiner make the two coordinated qualities parallel and clear.
- 5. Keep British spelling consistent Original: personalized customer service Suggested revision: personalised customer service Why it matters: British spelling is used elsewhere in the response, including “favouritism.”
- 6. Remove overlapping terms Original: potential for conflicts and disputes Suggested revision: potential for disputes Why it matters: “Conflicts” and “disputes” overlap in meaning, so one precise term is sufficient.
- 7. Specify operational effects Original: suboptimal outcomes and inefficiencies Suggested revision: poor decisions and operational inefficiencies Why it matters: The revision names the type of outcome and distinguishes it from inefficiency.
- 8. Remove redundant modifier Original: company's overall performance Suggested revision: company's performance Why it matters: “Performance” already refers to the company's results as a whole.
- 9. Avoid repeated modal Original: may work well in some cases, it may not Suggested revision: can work well in some cases, it may not Why it matters: Using different modals avoids repetition while preserving the contrast between possibility and limitation.
- 10. Sentence rewrite Original: In my opinion, while family-run businesses can offer advantages like strong cohesion and long-term vision, I believe that they may face more significant challenges in the long run. Suggested revision: In my opinion, although family-run businesses offer strong cohesion and a long-term vision, they may face greater challenges over time. Why it matters: The rewrite removes the redundant “In my opinion” and “I believe” framing while preserving the comparison.
Suggested Rewrites
- The ownership and operation of family businesses are prevalent Family ownership and management are common
- a potential source of challenges a source of potential challenges
- inherent problems that can hinder internal problems that may hinder
- a deep bond and commitment deep bonds and a shared commitment
- personalized customer service personalised customer service
- potential for conflicts and disputes potential for disputes
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response is strongest in its balanced, well-developed presentation of both perspectives, moving from family unity and commitment to conflicts, nepotism, and limits on innovation. Its main limitation is that the illustrative company example is somewhat generic and the separate opinion paragraph briefly repeats rather than extends the comparison. The highest-priority improvement is to justify more explicitly why the long-term risks outweigh the benefits by comparing their likely effects on sustainable growth.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Detailed feedback by IELTS writing criterion after the annotated essay.
Task Response
Both views are fully addressed with relevant development, and a clear, consistent opinion is maintained from the introduction to the conclusion.
Strengthen the evaluation by directly comparing how cohesion and loyalty may or may not compensate for conflict and nepotism over time.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response progresses logically through focused paragraphs, and cohesive devices guide the contrast and conclusion effectively.
Integrate the brief opinion paragraph into the conclusion or expand it with a distinct comparative reason to avoid slight repetition.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is precise, flexible, and appropriately academic, with effective business-related terms used naturally throughout.
Maintain the strong lexical control while replacing any generic illustrative naming with a more clearly contextualised example.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex structures is used accurately and fluently, with only rare minor lapses that do not impede communication.
Continue varying clause patterns while keeping pronoun reference and singular-plural choices consistently precise.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
In many countries, it is common for families to own and run their own businesses. Some people think this is the best way to run a business, while others consider this a potential source of problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.