Can computerised data collection on individuals be justified even though it endangers the rights of individuals?

It is true that 1withby the development of technology, 2collection and storage of citizens’ informationpreservation of citizens’ information has thoroughly changed. While organisations had to 3spend enormous sums of moneyspend tremendous money to gather and save data, now accessing 4such large volumes of informationsuch volume of mass information has become far easier. I personally think that 5despite some serious consequences of this methoddespite having some serious consequences of this method, the 6benefits outweigh the drawbacksbenefits surpass their drawbacks.

To begin with, several disadvantages have caused people’s information to be at 7greatermore risk. One important disadvantage is that their 8personal data can be more vulnerableprivacy can be more exposed to hackers. For instance, recently 9the Ashley Madison websiteAshly Maddison website, a popular dating 10websiteweb with over 33 million users, was hacked and 11lost its users’ sensitive informationloosed its users’ vital information in few seconds. 12Had computers not been introducedHad not computer been introduced, such accidents could have been avoided. Another negative impact is that 13the data might be misusedthey might be misused. Instead of 14using these data appropriatelyappropriate using of these data, some companies or 15government agenciesgovernmental sectors use them to 16increase their profitsraise their benefits. In particular, CIA, the 17US intelligence agencyUS intelligent system, uses 18social networksthe social network, including personal images or profiles, to 19act against individualsoperate against them.

From my opinion, modernisation has assisted many officials to find people’s information far simpler than in the past. One important advantage is that they can save more money. Obviously, to access citizens’ past history, they had to hire a large number of employees which led them to consume huge budget. As a prime example, to register birth information, the related organisation had to keep people’s files on large spaces, and thousands of personnel were needed to be hired to be able to find persons’ files. However, now in few seconds, the necessary statistics can be found and few employees are needed to be employed and paid than before. Another positive impact is that more secure computerised systems can protect these kinds of important information. Using antivirus or firewalls has levelled security of data, whereas in the past, accessing the papers was far more straightforward.

In conclusion, although digital preservation of individuals’ statics might have some negative consequences, its positive influences should not be forgotten. From my perspective, this technique has led we are able to save time and have a far more secure method for protection of citizens’ data.