Some people think that top-level authorities of a company should always take suggestions or ideas from employees to make any decision while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Response
The debate surrounding the extent to which top-level authorities should embrace employee suggestions and ideas in decision-makingdecision-making processes is a nuanced one. Proponents of employee involvement argue that it enhances organizational adaptabilitydynamism by tapping into the wealth of knowledge and creativity founddistributed throughout the workforce. Such inclusion can beThis inclusivity is seen as a key driver of innovation, fostering a culture where employees feel valued and empowered, ultimately contributing to a more motivated and productive workforce.
Conversely, critics contend that decision-making is a skill honed by senior leaders through years of experiencetop-level authorities through years of experience and strategic acumen. Overreliance on employee input, they argue, may lead to decision paralysis and hinder the efficient implementationexecution of strategic plans.
Leaders, according to this perspective, are appointed for their ability to make tough decisions that align with the long-term vision of the company. In this view, excessive employee participation in decision-makingtoo much democracy in decision-making could compromise the agility and clarity of the decision-making process.
In my view, a judicious integration of both approaches is essential. Recognizing the value of employee perspectives while maintaining the clear leadershipclarity of leadership is crucial. Decisions should be categorized based on their strategic impact, with routine matters benefiting from collective input and majormore strategic decisions relying on the expertise of top-level authorities.
Why this response received Band 7.5
The response is strongest in its controlled language and clear, balanced progression from the two perspectives to a nuanced opinion. Its main limitation is that, at only 204 words, the arguments remain somewhat compressed and receive little concrete support. The priority is to extend each side with a specific workplace example and explain more fully why the proposed division between routine and strategic decisions is effective.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both views and a clear, nuanced opinion are presented, but the short response limits the depth and support of the main ideas.
Develop each perspective with a concrete workplace example and extend the reasoning behind the final decision-making distinction.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument progresses logically and cohesive devices are controlled, although the separate third paragraph continues rather than advances the preceding point.
Combine closely related material and use each body paragraph to develop one complete viewpoint before moving to the next.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied, precise, and appropriately formal, with sophisticated phrasing used naturally throughout most of the response.
Prefer the most direct collocations in places where abstract phrasing such as clarity of leadership sounds slightly compressed.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex sentence structures is handled accurately, and grammatical errors are rare.
Maintain this control while adding more detailed supporting sentences and varied forms of exemplification.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that top-level authorities of a company should always take suggestions or ideas from employees to make any decision while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.