Some people think that top level authorities of a company should always take suggestions or ideas from employees to take any decision while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Response
It is a true fact to consider that today's world has become a global village. Due to that reason, business has to face huge competition to catch-up the highly competitive market. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opinion that in the company top management should consider employees suggestions or ideas before making the decisions or innovation while others consider that they should take decisions on their own. This essay will assert both sides of the contention before deducing a reasonable conclusion.
Higher authorities should consider employees suggestions or ideas before taking important decisions for the company. First and foremost, job experience could be a significant factor. It is generally seen that majority of the people working in the particular area have become experienced professionals with different practical knowledge that the management could use in their favour for decision making. The fact could be demonstrated by in the food processing industry; food processing has been divided into various sectors such as harvesting, separating, filling, packaging and labelling etc. and to take decision appropriate employees should be engaged in the decision-making. The engagement of employees in decision making creates a very positive impression and inspires them to work better. The employees start feeling as part of the company and their output significantly increases. This is also an effective measure to control the mutiny of the labour in an industry.
There are some groups who are in favour of the idea that management should not consider employees suggestions or ideas when they make decisions, in spite of views discussed above. Management responsibility could be a substantial reason behind the opponent's viewpoint. There are companies where it is believed that the higher management is responsible for coming up with the best decision and innovation for better a future because they believe employees add ideas or suggestions for their personal interests.
In conclusion, undoubtedly, company managements have higher responsibilities to take plausibility of implementation for the healthier future; however, as far as I am concerned, lower level worked force has immense experienced of their profession. Therefore, without any reasonable concern employees cannot be neglected and their decision and feedback should always be included while taking any decision for the company.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Remove redundant opening Original: It is a true fact to consider that Suggested revision: It is true that Why it matters: ‘True fact’ is redundant, and ‘to consider’ does not fit this statement.
- 2. Use concise link Original: Due to that reason Suggested revision: For this reason Why it matters: This is a more concise and natural causal connector.
- 3. Use plural subject Original: business has to face Suggested revision: businesses face Why it matters: The general statement refers to companies collectively, so a plural subject is appropriate.
- 4. Fix market collocation Original: to catch-up the highly competitive market Suggested revision: to compete in a highly competitive market Why it matters: ‘Catch up’ does not take a market as a direct object in this context.
- 5. Fix order and possessive Original: in the company top management should consider employees suggestions Suggested revision: top management in a company should consider employees’ suggestions Why it matters: The revision corrects the word order and adds the required possessive apostrophe.
- 6. Use parallel actions Original: making the decisions or innovation Suggested revision: making decisions or introducing innovations Why it matters: The coordinated objects need parallel and natural verb–noun combinations.
- 7. Use accurate reporting verb Original: assert both sides of the contention Suggested revision: discuss both sides of the issue Why it matters: An essay discusses opposing views rather than asserting both of them.
- 8. Use natural collocation Original: taking important decisions Suggested revision: making important decisions Why it matters: ‘Make a decision’ is the standard collocation in this context.
- 9. Add definite article Original: that majority of the people Suggested revision: that the majority of people Why it matters: ‘Majority’ requires the definite article, while the general noun ‘people’ does not need one.
- 10. Use indefinite article Original: in the particular area Suggested revision: in a particular area Why it matters: No previously identified area is being specified, so the indefinite article is required.
- 11. Fix uncountable phrasing Original: different practical knowledge Suggested revision: a range of practical knowledge Why it matters: ‘Knowledge’ is uncountable, so it cannot naturally be modified by ‘different’ in this form.
- 12. Fix complement pattern Original: start feeling as part of the company Suggested revision: start feeling like part of the company Why it matters: ‘Feel like part of’ is the natural complement pattern for belonging.
Suggested Rewrites
- It is a true fact to consider that It is true that
- Due to that reason For this reason
- business has to face businesses face
- to catch-up the highly competitive market to compete in a highly competitive market
- in the company top management should consider employees suggestions top management in a company should consider employees’ suggestions
- making the decisions or innovation making decisions or introducing innovations
Why this response received Band 6.0
The response’s strongest feature is its well-supported case for consulting employees, using their practical expertise and motivation as relevant reasons. Its main limitation is the much thinner treatment of the opposing view, whose claims about managerial responsibility and employee self-interest are asserted rather than developed. The highest priority is to explain and exemplify that counterargument more fully, then express the final judgement in clearer, more controlled language.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Detailed feedback by IELTS writing criterion after the annotated essay.
Task Response
Both views and a final opinion are present, but the argument against employee consultation is substantially less developed than the supporting case.
Extend the opposing view with a clear explanation or example showing why managers might make decisions independently, then weigh it against the preferred view.
Coherence and Cohesion
The four-paragraph structure and main progression are clear, although some transitions are formulaic and several sentences carry too many ideas at once.
Use shorter, more focused sentences within each body paragraph and make the contrast between the two viewpoints more direct.
Lexical Resource
The response attempts a reasonably broad business vocabulary, but frequent unnatural collocations and inaccurate word forms weaken precision.
Replace strained phrases such as ‘mutiny of the labour’, ‘take plausibility of implementation’, and ‘lower level worked force’ with natural business English.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A mix of sentence forms is attempted, but frequent errors in articles, possessives, agreement, word forms, and clause construction sometimes obscure meaning.
Prioritise accurate core sentence patterns and proofread every noun phrase and verb form before adding more complex clauses.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that top level authorities of a company should always take suggestions or ideas from employees to take any decision while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.