Nowadays many scientists and tourists would like to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Sample Response
Since ancient times, planet EarthPlanet earth has hostedis known to host a multitude of natural resources, scenic beauty, polar ice caps, mountain ranges, hidden terrains and so on. Often scientistsScientists and tourists travel all over the earth to explore remote natural placeshidden natural place, admire their beauty or conduct scientific researchresearches on their ecosystemsover its ecosystem. This essay will analyse the merits and demerits associated with these explorations before drawing a logical conclusion.
One of the benefits of exploring distant natural ecosystemsecosystem by scientists and touristsby scientist and sightseer is to study the local inhabitants, flora and fauna and the impact of climate changeand impact of climatic changes in that region over time. Scientists can conduct researchperform their research work which can potentially lead to some important discoveries about the evolution of life on earth, climatic behaviour and so on. Analysis of snow caps in Polar Regions, rivers in Arizona, lakes in the Himalayaslakes in Himalaya's and soil in remote forests can help to answer unsolved mysteries. Tourists can enjoy the untouched beauty of that region, relax in peaceful surroundingsrelax their souls and enjoy their vacations. For instance, many holidaymakers prefer to choose sites that are not crowded and far away from known places, so that they can enjoy natureenjoy the nature to its full extent and revive their souls.
On the contrary, these explorations often incur huge expenses. People visiting remote places can put their lives at riskrisk their lives in danger due to the unavailabilitydue to unavailability of basic necessities of life like food, water, medicines and so on. Moreover, unknown environmental and climatic changes can have adverse effects on their lives. These explorations might attract more tourists which will destroy its beauty and ecosystems and local habitatsecosystem of local in-habitats.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned provides several plausible arguments in favour of both views. However, in my opinion, advantages outweigh the disadvantages as such exploration not only resultsthe exploration not only result in important discoveries but it also helps kerb the human desire for adventure and thrill.
Why this response received Band 6.5
The essay addresses both benefits and drawbacks and gives a clear view that exploration's advantages are greater, supported by relevant scientific and tourism examples. The main limitation is that the final weighing is thin and sometimes contradictory, particularly the claim that increased tourism threatens ecosystems; the priority is to compare research benefits with environmental damage directly and explain what safeguards make the benefits prevail.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The task is addressed with relevant content, but key details or reasoning need fuller precision.
Develop the main features or claims with exact, verifiable support.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response has a clear overall structure, though local progression can be more precise.
Use explicit, economical sequencing and remove repetition.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is sufficient for the task, but several collocations or word choices are inaccurate.
Replace awkward combinations with standard academic or task-specific phrasing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A range of forms is attempted, but recurring grammar errors reduce accuracy.
Proofread agreement, articles, prepositions and clause structure.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Nowadays many scientists and tourists would like to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.