Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The concept of philanthropy and charitable giving has gained significant attention in recent years. One prominent viewpoint suggests that everyone should contribute a fixed portion of their income to support charitable causes, although I would side with those holding the opposite opinion.
Charitable donations play a pivotal role in addressing poverty. When individuals allocate a fixed portion of their income, it ensures a steady flow of resources to organizations dedicated to poverty alleviation. For example, groups like Oxfam and UNICEF rely on public donations to implement projects that provide food, clean water, and healthcare services to impoverished communities. The consistent support from individuals enables these organizations to make a lasting impact, uplifting vulnerable populations and offering them a chance for a better future.
While the recommendation of mandatory donations has its merits, it is essential to acknowledge that individuals have diverse financial situations and priorities. Forcing every individual to donate a fixed portion of their income can be seen an infringement on personal freedom. In placing this burden on citizens, there may be a resultant backlash that does more harm than the originally intended good. Relatedly, it is important to recognize that there are alternative ways of supporting charitable causes, such as volunteering time and skills. Encouraging a culture of giving without imposing strict regulations may allow individuals to better choose the method that aligns with their personal circumstances and values.
In conclusion, the contention that everyone should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity aligns with the ideal of an equitable society. However, it is crucial to consider individual circumstances and preferences, ensuring that the act of giving remains a voluntary and personally meaningful endeavor.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. State the contrast directly Original: although I would side with those holding the opposite opinion Suggested revision: but I side with the opposite view Why it matters: But marks the contrast more directly and removes the indirect reference to people holding a view.
- 2. Clarify the pronoun Original: it ensures a steady flow Suggested revision: these contributions ensure a steady flow Why it matters: A plural noun phrase gives the verb a clear subject and avoids an uncertain pronoun reference.
- 3. Use the precise noun Original: recommendation of mandatory donations Suggested revision: proposal for mandatory donations Why it matters: Proposal is more precise for a policy idea that is being evaluated.
- 4. Add the required preposition Original: can be seen an infringement Suggested revision: can be seen as an infringement Why it matters: The passive expression be seen requires as before the complement.
- 5. Use a clearer transition Original: Relatedly Suggested revision: Furthermore Why it matters: Furthermore more clearly signals that another supporting point is being added.
- 6. Clarify possession Original: volunteering time and skills Suggested revision: volunteering their time and skills Why it matters: Their makes clear that individuals contribute their own time and skills.
- 7. Place the modifier naturally Original: better choose the method that aligns Suggested revision: choose the method that best aligns Why it matters: Best naturally modifies aligns and clearly expresses the closest fit.
- 8. Name the policy idea Original: contention Suggested revision: proposal Why it matters: Proposal is a more neutral and precise label for the suggested donation requirement.
- 9. Use a stronger collocation Original: aligns with the ideal Suggested revision: reflects the ideal Why it matters: Reflects the ideal is more natural when describing how a proposal embodies a principle.
- 10. Sentence rewrite Original: In placing this burden on citizens, there may be a resultant backlash that does more harm than the originally intended good. Suggested revision: Placing this burden on citizens may provoke a backlash that does more harm than the policy's intended benefits. Why it matters: The rewrite removes the dangling introductory phrase and expresses the comparison naturally.
- 11. Strengthen internal progression Suggested revision: Present the financial-freedom objection first, then signal the move to alternative forms of giving as a distinct supporting point. Why it matters: A clearer two-step progression would make the paragraph's shift from criticism to alternatives easier to follow.
Suggested Rewrites
- although I would side with those holding the opposite opinion but I side with the opposite view
- it ensures a steady flow these contributions ensure a steady flow
- recommendation of mandatory donations proposal for mandatory donations
- can be seen an infringement can be seen as an infringement
- Relatedly Furthermore
- volunteering time and skills volunteering their time and skills
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response is strongest in its clear progression and well-supported explanation of how regular donations can alleviate poverty, followed by a persuasive case for voluntary giving. The main limitation is that the disagreement is expressed somewhat indirectly in the conclusion and the mandatory nature of the proposal could be analysed more precisely. Prioritise stating the final extent of disagreement unequivocally and linking each argument directly to a fixed income contribution.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response maintains a clear disagreement with compulsory fixed contributions and develops relevant benefits, drawbacks, and alternatives.
State the precise extent of disagreement more explicitly in the conclusion and distinguish a fixed amount from a fixed proportion.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing is purposeful, progression is easy to follow, and cohesive devices connect the contrasting arguments effectively.
Make the transition from the benefits paragraph to the writer’s opposing case even sharper by explicitly relating both to compulsion.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied, precise, and appropriately formal, with only occasional slightly forced combinations.
Prefer simpler idiomatic wording where phrases such as “resultant backlash” make the argument sound unnecessarily engineered.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Complex sentences are varied and consistently well controlled, with only rare minor grammatical slips.
Check small omitted-function-word errors, particularly the missing “as” in “can be seen as an infringement.”
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.