Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and place of the offence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The law is a system of rules and guidelines and it shapes political, social and economic relationships of people. Some people say that laws should be flexible because of different reasons and it should be amendable in different situations. However, this essay would discuss that laws should never be bounded by situations because flexibility would only make the system vulnerable and increase the crime rate. First and foremost, flexibility in rules and regulations make it weak. People personalised ordinance for their needs. The laws mould and use it makes difficult to judge and provide justice people who really deserve it. Moreover, flexibility in laws leads people to find loopholes. Thus, offenders can escape from punishment by finding excuses and moulding laws for their rights. Secondly, the crime rate has decreased due to fear of punishment. The bendable laws give more safety from the penalty of the crime. In addition, people think that crimes resolve their problems and flexible law safeguard them from the punishment. Therefore, more people do crimes because of lack of fear of punishment. Furthermore, flexible laws make confusion in people about what is wrong and right, people may part in crime due to unaware of flexible laws. Ironically, some people may part in crime unintentionally; flexible laws help people to get a solution from it. In some cases, people may do crimes but it was good for society, like this situation bendable law help them from punishment. To conclude, laws are essential for the better life of people. Flexibility in law deteriorates the overall performance of system and justice based on circumstances less productive. Notwithstanding, the update in law is needed as time changes.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use correct preposition Original: of Suggested revision: among Why it matters: Among is the natural preposition for relationships involving multiple people.
- 2. Use concise wording Original: because of different reasons Suggested revision: for various reasons Why it matters: For various reasons expresses the same idea more directly.
- 3. Match plural subject Original: it Suggested revision: they Why it matters: The pronoun must agree with the plural noun laws.
- 4. State argument directly Original: would discuss that Suggested revision: argues that Why it matters: Argues that correctly introduces the essay's claim.
- 5. Improve word choice Original: bounded by situations Suggested revision: constrained by circumstances Why it matters: Constrained by circumstances is the natural expression for this meaning.
- 6. Clarify intended meaning Original: moulding laws for their rights Suggested revision: manipulating laws to their advantage Why it matters: The revision clearly expresses offenders using legal flexibility for personal benefit.
- 7. Use formal term Original: bendable Suggested revision: flexible Why it matters: Flexible is the appropriate formal adjective for laws.
- 8. Fix awkward collocation Original: give more safety from the penalty of the crime Suggested revision: offer greater protection from penalties for crimes Why it matters: The revised collocations convey protection from legal penalties clearly.
- 9. Use gerund subject Original: crimes resolve their problems Suggested revision: committing crimes resolves their problems Why it matters: The action of committing crimes, rather than crimes themselves, is the intended subject.
- 10. Fix agreement Original: law Suggested revision: laws Why it matters: The plural subject laws agrees with the base-form verb safeguard.
- 11. Remove unnecessary article Original: from the punishment Suggested revision: from punishment Why it matters: Punishment is used generically here and does not need the definite article.
- 12. Use correct collocation Original: do Suggested revision: commit Why it matters: English uses commit, rather than do, with crimes.
Suggested Rewrites
- of among
- because of different reasons for various reasons
- it they
- would discuss that argues that
- bounded by situations constrained by circumstances
- moulding laws for their rights manipulating laws to their advantage
Why this response received Band 5.5
The response maintains a generally clear opposition to flexible laws and offers several relevant concerns, including loopholes and reduced deterrence. Its strongest ideas are weakened by unclear development, a late concession that is not reconciled with the position, and frequent lexical and grammatical errors that sometimes strain meaning. Build two well-explained arguments in separate paragraphs, then integrate any concession explicitly and revise awkward sentence structures and collocations.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response presents a relevant position and supporting concerns, but explanations are uneven and the concession about flexibility remains unresolved.
Clarify the extent of agreement and develop two distinct reasons before explaining how limited legal updates fit that position.
Coherence and Cohesion
Basic sequencing markers show an intended progression, but the single-paragraph format and unclear links make the argument difficult to follow in places.
Separate the introduction, each main reason, and the conclusion into paragraphs with clear internal topic development.
Lexical Resource
The response attempts varied legal vocabulary, but frequent inaccurate collocations and word choices sometimes obscure the intended meaning.
Use precise combinations such as 'exploit loopholes,' 'deter crime,' and 'consider mitigating circumstances' instead of forced synonyms.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A mixture of sentence forms is attempted, but frequent agreement, article, clause, and punctuation errors reduce clarity.
Revise each sentence for a complete subject-verb structure, accurate agreement, and controlled coordination before adding complexity.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and place of the offence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.