Some people think that the increasingly flexible working environment nowadays, such as working at home, has a positive impact on workers' lives. Others, however, feel this development is just a means for organisations such as private companies to exploit workers for profit. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Sample Response
Nowadays, employers are offering a flexible working environment to their employees such as work from home or any other place of their own choice. This has become possible with the advancement of technology and hence dramatically improved workers’ performance. Some people argue that freedom of working location significantly helps in reducing time and cost incurred on travelling and other expenses. Others claim that companies from lucrative business often adopt this trend only because of their profit and this is negative for the employees in the long run. Firstly workers spend a huge amount and significant time on travelling to and from their workplaces. This expenditure has to be pay from employee’s pockets; thus allowing them work from home would substantially save their money. Secondly working in a relaxing and stress-free situation drastically improve the quality of work and also reduce the time for the accomplishment of tasks. Additionally, an employee gets an opportunity to spend more quality time with their family at home. However, a large number of employee deprive off from learning basic traits of office such as teamwork, dedication, punctuality and strategies forming in absence of professional working environment. Moreover, companies save handsome amount as they do not have to pay for building rent, bills and other expenditure incurred in running a business. On the other hand, employee pay is not commensurate with their efforts and skills. Since many companies do not need their employees to be present physically at the office, the authorities are taking advantages of this facility and creating negative impacts on the employee's future career. To sum up I would like to say professional workplaces provide conducive learning and working environment than homes. Companies with free choice of work location are the main deterrent in employee’s future progress, as jobs ethics and behaviours can only be learned while working at a workplace.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use parallel gerund Original: work Suggested revision: working Why it matters: The example requires a gerund after such as.
- 2. Complete present perfect Original: and hence dramatically improved Suggested revision: and has therefore dramatically improved Why it matters: The subject This needs the auxiliary has before the past participle improved.
- 3. Use work-location phrase Original: freedom of working location Suggested revision: flexibility in work location Why it matters: The revision expresses location flexibility with a natural collocation.
- 4. Describe profit-driven firms Original: companies from lucrative business Suggested revision: profit-oriented companies Why it matters: The original phrase is not grammatical or idiomatic.
- 5. State profit motive Original: because of their profit Suggested revision: to increase their profits Why it matters: The infinitive clearly expresses the companies' claimed purpose.
- 6. Add transition comma Original: Firstly workers Suggested revision: Firstly, workers Why it matters: An introductory sequencing adverb requires a following comma.
- 7. Name money explicitly Original: a huge amount and significant time Suggested revision: a large amount of money and significant time Why it matters: Amount needs a noun, and money makes the parallel costs clear.
- 8. Use passive participle Original: pay Suggested revision: paid Why it matters: The passive construction requires the past participle paid.
- 9. Fix plural possession Original: from employee’s pockets Suggested revision: out of employees' pockets Why it matters: The statement concerns workers generally, requiring a plural possessive and the idiom out of pocket.
- 10. Add infinitive marker Original: allowing them work Suggested revision: allowing them to work Why it matters: Allow takes an object followed by a to-infinitive.
- 11. Add second transition comma Original: Secondly working Suggested revision: Secondly, working Why it matters: The sequencing adverb should be separated from the clause by a comma.
- 12. Fix subject and agreement Original: situation drastically improve Suggested revision: environment drastically improves Why it matters: Environment is the appropriate noun and the singular subject requires improves.
Suggested Rewrites
- work working
- and hence dramatically improved and has therefore dramatically improved
- freedom of working location flexibility in work location
- companies from lucrative business profit-oriented companies
- because of their profit to increase their profits
- Firstly workers Firstly, workers
Why this response received Band 6.0
The response addresses both perspectives and reaches a clear opinion, with useful explanation of commuting savings, family time, workplace learning, and employer costs. Its main weakness is that the exploitation argument remains only partly developed, while the single-paragraph structure and frequent language errors blur the contrast between views. Prioritise separate body paragraphs and explain exactly how remote-work savings could translate into underpayment or career disadvantage for employees.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Detailed feedback by IELTS writing criterion after the annotated essay.
Task Response
Both views and a clear preference for conventional workplaces are presented, but the claim that companies exploit remote workers is not fully explained.
Show a precise mechanism of exploitation, such as transferring office costs to staff, extending unpaid availability, or using location flexibility to suppress pay.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument moves recognisably from benefits to disadvantages and opinion, but presenting the entire essay as one paragraph weakens progression and comparison.
Use an introduction, one body paragraph for worker benefits, one for organisational exploitation, and a separate conclusion.
Lexical Resource
The essay attempts a useful range of work-related vocabulary, but frequent inaccurate combinations such as 'companies from lucrative business', 'deprive off', and 'save handsome amount' reduce precision.
Use natural forms such as 'profit-driven companies', 'be deprived of', and 'save a substantial amount', checking collocations systematically.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A mixture of sentence forms communicates the main ideas, though frequent agreement, article, plural, and verb-form errors weaken control.
Check every subject-verb pair and passive form, revising phrases such as 'has to be pay' to 'has to be paid' and 'working ... improve' to 'working ... improves'.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that the increasingly flexible working environment nowadays, such as working at home, has a positive impact on workers' lives. Others, however, feel this development is just a means for organisations such as private companies to exploit workers for profit. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.