Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both these views and give own your opinion.
This response is estimated at Band 7.5. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Friends are important people in our liveslife and our friendships often shape who we becomeour friendship often defines what type of person we are. When it comes to choosing companions, some believe our friends should always agree with us, while others prefer to have companions who sometimes differ on important issues. This essay aims to explore both perspectives and argue that it is better to have friends who sometimes oppose our views.
Those who think that we should select friends who always agree with us believe that similar-minded people form stronger friendshipsbecome better friends and can avoid conflicts. We all have our own opinions, and no matter how progressive we think we are when someone opposes our views - be it as important as political, cultural or religious, or as simple as a holiday destination or a cinema to watch - we tend to start disliking this person. This is why having people who share the same interests, views and belief systemsinterests, opinions, views and belief systems Deleteas our friends not only makes our liveslife more enjoyable but also helps us avoid altercations and serious arguments. For instance, in my experience,from my experience, I can say that most people prefer to spend time with thosemost people like to spend more time with people who agree with their views and opinions and avoid those who have contrasting opinions.
In contrastOn the contrary, those who advocate for having friends who sometimes hold contrasting opinionsfriends with sometimes contrasting opinions believe it helps us look at matters from a different perspective. For instance, when one of my uncles chose to migrate to Latvia a few years ago, one of his friends opposed his idea and persuaded him to go to Canada instead. After a few years, the latter optionidea proved to be a far better choicewas proven to be a far better choice. Moreover, when friends express different views on important issues, we tend to considerhear their arguments and look at things from a different perspective. This helps us grow as peoplegrow as a person and opens up new optionsopens new windows of options that we can consider carefully for ourselves. In my opinion, having friends who sometimes expressgive bold and honest views that may contradict our opinions, isare a far better choice than having pals who always agree with us.
In conclusion, friends are important in our liveslife and have a great influence on the way we think and behavethe way think and behave. Therefore, we should choose them carefully considering what types of friends would be more helpful for us and whose companionship we would enjoy. Personally, I think that we should select friends who sometimes have views that contrast with ourscontrasting views than ours as it benefits us profoundly.
Why this response received Band 7.5
The response addresses both perspectives clearly, maintains a consistent preference for constructive disagreement, and develops each side with relevant explanation and examples. Its principal limitation is occasional imprecision in wording and grammar, including awkward comparisons and agreement errors, while some supporting claims could be examined more critically. The priority is to refine collocations and sentence control so the otherwise strong argument is expressed with greater naturalness and accuracy.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both views are fully addressed, the writer's opinion is clear throughout, and the main ideas are relevant and well extended.
Deepen the analysis by qualifying the claim that agreement prevents conflict and distinguishing healthy disagreement from incompatibility.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay progresses logically through a clear introduction, balanced body paragraphs, and a consistent conclusion, with well-managed cohesion.
Reduce reliance on overt signposting such as repeated example markers where the logical relationship is already clear.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied and generally effective, although several collocations and comparisons are awkward or imprecise.
Replace expressions such as opens new windows of options and contrasting views than ours with more natural formulations.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Complex sentences are frequent and usually accurate, but occasional agreement, omission, and comparative-form errors remain noticeable.
Proofread specifically for subject-verb agreement, missing pronouns, and the correct forms used after comparative adjectives.