The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The overconsumption of fossil fuels has become a major concern in recent years. Some people suggest that increasing fuel prices could help address environmental problemscould be a solution to environmental issues. Personally, I believe that other measures should also receive equal considerationbe given equal consideration.
Firstly, increasing fuel prices cannot significantly reduce global dependence on fossil fuels. Even if the price of fuel rises considerably, people will not be able to immediately reduce the high demandcut down on the massive demand for petrol. In daily lifeFor example, in daily life, people still need to use their cars despite fluctuations in fuel prices. Moreover, petrol is also crucial for other uses, including manufacturing and agricultureother applications, such as in manufacturing and agriculture. If fuel prices increase, the national economy could suffer several adverse consequences.
When it comes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, other measures should be taken to address the problem of overconsumption. One practical solution is to reduce energy demand in daily activitiesreduce demand in daily activities, such as travel and production. This can be achieved by encouraging the use of energy-efficient products, like hybrid cars, or by implementing new energy-saving technologies in manufacturing. Additionally, a more sustainable solution is to reduce reliance on fossil fuels by embracing alternative energy sourcesalternative resources. Wind and tidal power in the Netherlands, nuclear power in Japan, and solar power in the United States have all proved effective at producing energyproven efficient in energy production. These technologies could be adopted in other parts of the world to reduce global dependence on fossil fuels.
All the evidence presented above shows that simply increasing fuel prices will not effectively reduce global warming. Stronger alternative measures need to be implemented to tackle this problemsituation.
Why this response received Band 7.5
The response’s strongest feature is its clear, consistently maintained position, supported by a logical comparison between fuel-price increases and alternative environmental measures. Its main limitation is that the argument against higher prices relies on fairly general assertions about unavoidable demand and economic harm rather than examining how price changes could still influence consumption. The priority is to deepen that evaluation with more specific causal reasoning and evidence.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear position is maintained and both the limitations of fuel-price increases and viable alternatives are relevantly developed.
Evaluate more directly why pricing is less effective than the proposed alternatives, using specific causal evidence.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas progress logically through focused paragraphs, with cohesive devices used naturally and unobtrusively.
Make the transition from rejecting fuel-price rises to comparing alternative measures more explicitly argumentative.
Lexical Resource
A broad and generally precise vocabulary supports clear discussion of energy use, emissions, and economic effects.
Refine a few broad collocations, such as references to demand and alternative resources, for greater precision.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex structures is controlled accurately, with only rare minor lapses.
Maintain this control while varying sentence openings and tightening occasional heavily modified sentences.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.