Some people think that modern buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more important than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
While functionality undoubtedly holds immense importance in modern architecture, the notion that it should reign supreme over design overlooks the multifaceted role architecture plays in shaping human experience. To assert that design is merely a decorative afterthought is to disregard the profound impact it can have on our emotions, perceptions, and well-being.
Firstly, design possesses the unique ability to elevate a building's purpose beyond its mere functionality. A well-designed structure can inspire, uplift, and even provoke thought, enriching the lives of its users and transforming the surrounding environment. The Guggenheim Museum in New York City, for example, transcends its function as an art gallery, becoming a landmark and symbol of artistic expression through its striking spiral design.
Moreover, design plays a crucial role in fostering a sense of community and belonging. Buildings that are aesthetically pleasing and incorporate elements that invite interaction can create vibrant public spaces, fostering social connections and a sense of shared ownership. Conversely, buildings designed solely with functionality in mind can often feel sterile and uninspiring, discouraging interaction and hindering the development of a vibrant community. The design of public squares and community centres exemplifies the importance of aesthetics in fostering a sense of community, as these spaces often act as hubs for social interaction and cultural exchange.
In conclusion, while functionality remains an essential aspect of modern architecture, neglecting the power of design is a missed opportunity. By recognizing the profound impact design has on our emotions, perceptions, and well-being, architects can create buildings that not only serve their intended purpose but also inspire, uplift, and contribute to the cultural landscape.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use direct adjective Original: holds immense importance Suggested revision: is immensely important Why it matters: The adjective construction states the importance more directly than “holds importance.”
- 2. Use formal priority phrase Original: reign supreme over design Suggested revision: take precedence over design Why it matters: “Take precedence over” expresses priority without the figurative language of “reign supreme.”
- 3. Use concise noun complement Original: the multifaceted role architecture plays Suggested revision: the multifaceted role of architecture Why it matters: The of-phrase expresses the same relationship more concisely.
- 4. Avoid unsupported uniqueness Original: possesses the unique ability to elevate Suggested revision: can elevate Why it matters: The modal verb preserves the claim without asserting that this ability is unique.
- 5. Remove unnecessary possessive Original: beyond its mere functionality Suggested revision: beyond mere functionality Why it matters: The building is already the subject, so the possessive determiner is unnecessary.
- 6. Clarify paired roles Original: becoming a landmark and symbol Suggested revision: becoming both a landmark and a symbol Why it matters: The correlative structure clearly marks the museum's two coordinated roles.
- 7. Vary repeated verb Original: fostering Suggested revision: strengthening Why it matters: “Strengthening” avoids repeating “fostering” from the preceding sentence while preserving the meaning.
- 8. Remove redundant hedge Original: can often feel sterile Suggested revision: can feel sterile Why it matters: The modal “can” already signals possibility, making “often” unnecessary here.
- 9. Avoid repeated vibrant Original: vibrant Suggested revision: cohesive Why it matters: “Cohesive” fits the social connection claim and avoids repeating “vibrant.”
- 10. Use concise causal wording Original: exemplifies the importance of aesthetics in fostering a sense of community Suggested revision: demonstrates how aesthetics can foster community Why it matters: The revision expresses the relationship more directly and avoids an abstract noun chain.
- 11. Use direct consequence Original: neglecting the power of design is a missed opportunity Suggested revision: neglecting design forfeits an opportunity Why it matters: The active verb “forfeits” states the consequence more directly.
- 12. Add relative marker Original: the profound impact design has Suggested revision: the profound impact that design has Why it matters: The relative marker makes the embedded clause easier to parse.
Suggested Rewrites
- holds immense importance is immensely important
- reign supreme over design take precedence over design
- the multifaceted role architecture plays the multifaceted role of architecture
- possesses the unique ability to elevate can elevate
- beyond its mere functionality beyond mere functionality
- becoming a landmark and symbol becoming both a landmark and a symbol
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response’s strongest feature is its sophisticated, cohesive defence of design, developed through persuasive discussion of human experience, landmark architecture, and community life. Its main limitation is that functionality is acknowledged rather than meaningfully weighed against those benefits, so the extent of disagreement could be more precisely defined. The highest-priority improvement is to compare design and function directly and establish how architects should balance them when they conflict.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear disagreement is sustained and supported by two well-developed arguments with relevant examples.
Define the precise extent of disagreement and directly evaluate circumstances in which functional needs should take priority.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument progresses smoothly through well-focused paragraphs, and cohesive devices support rather than interrupt the reasoning.
Strengthen the progression by linking the community argument more explicitly to the central comparison between design and functionality.
Lexical Resource
The response uses a wide, precise, and sophisticated architectural vocabulary with natural collocation.
Reduce repeated use of design, fostering, and sense of community through selective lexical variation and tighter phrasing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A broad range of complex structures is used with consistently strong accuracy, flexibility, and punctuation control.
Preserve this control while introducing occasional shorter emphatic sentences to vary rhythm and sharpen key claims.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that modern buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more important than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.