Many believe that the traditional educational system of teachers and students in a classroomwill be replaced by 2050. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
This response is estimated at Band 5.5. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Education plays an important role in modern society; therefore,society,therefore a scientific education system can significantly benefit both students and teachersimprove students and teachers.In this era, a new point that is the educational system which is teachers and students in classroom will be changed by 2050.Inin my personal view,i disagree with this view,and here are my reasons.and there is my explanation:
The primary reason for my stance is that traditionalstance is traditional education is the most suitable for students of different levelsdifferent level students. For example,it givesgive an opportunity that poor students and rich students can get the same quality of educationsame quality education which can make the public education more equal. By contrast, ifBy contrast,If the traditional system is eventually replaced, wealthy families will send their children to special schools from the beginning of their education. This will lead to a severe imbalance in educational resources and thus give rise to some social problems.
On the other handOn other hand,teaching in school classroom has balanced mode for several generations all over the worldover the world,while history of education has provenprove that the system of education is relatively teaching system.However,if this model is changed in a few decades,it will definitely increase the pressure onof teachers and decrease the quality of education.It is noticeablenoticeably that not every nation has this ability or budget to make the huge change.
In conclusion, while a new systemnew system probably can makemaking some innovations of education,but it also can bring many disadvantages to students and teachers.Based on an analysis of the current situation and the potential problems, I am opposed to this viewpoint.
Why this response received Band 5.5
文章明确表态不同意传统课堂教学会在2050年被取代，并从教育公平与成本压力角度展开论述，任务回应基本完整。然而，文章在逻辑衔接上不够流畅，且存在较多基础的语法错误与用词不当。最优先的改进方向是加强句法准确性，尤其是动词形式和主谓结构的控制。
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
任务回应
文章清楚表明了反对意见，并提供了如教育公平和国家财政负担等切题的论据加以支持。
建议对论据展开更深入的因果分析，进一步解释为何传统课堂无法被新技术或新模式彻底取代。
连贯与衔接
段落划分大致清晰，但过度使用机械的衔接词，且部分句子逻辑推进不够连贯。
注意避免重复使用连词（如 while...but 混用），并增强句子内部的逻辑演进。
词汇资源
尝试使用了部分学术词汇，但词汇量较受限，且存在多处拼写与表达搭配不当的情况。
积累并准确运用教育类高频词汇与搭配，减少像 can making 这样基础的词形错误。
语法多样性与准确性
存在频繁的语法错误，包括主谓一致、标点空格规范、句式杂糅以及冠词缺失等问题。
重点练习基础句型结构，确保谓语动词的正确形式以及从句的合规连接。