The restoration of historic buildings in major cities around the world involves significant government expenditure. These funds could be better allocated towards the development of new housing and road infrastructure. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The substantial expenditure on restoring historic edifices in global metropolises has prompted debate over whether these funds might more effectively address critical urban infrastructure needs. I believe that, while reallocating resources towards housing and transport could alleviate immediate pressures, the enduring cultural, economic, and environmental benefits of heritage restoration justify the investment.
Redirecting restoration budgets to pressing urban necessities can indeed yield swift improvements in living standards and mobility. Rapid population growth has precipitated acute shortages of affordable housing, forcing many residents into overcrowded or substandard accommodations; channeling funds into low-cost housing developments would expand the supply of decent homes and ease social strain. Similarly, ageing and congested road networks sap economic productivity through daily gridlock, as seen in rush-hour bottlenecks across major megacities; upgrading or expanding transport arteries would reduce commute times and bolster efficiency.
Nonetheless, I am convinced that the restoration of historic architecture delivers irreplaceable long-term value that transcends short-term fixes. The first reason behind my belief is that heritage landmarks serve as tangible anchors of cultural identity and collective memory. This means that maintaining these icons preserves their aesthetic and historical appeal. As a result, steady tourist visits generate significant revenue streams that help offset restoration costs. Furthermore, adaptive reuse of existing structures often entails a lower carbon footprint than new construction. An illustrative example is the conversion of disused warehouses into vibrant mixed-use districts that marry preservation with contemporary urban living. This demonstrates that heritage restoration functions as a multifaceted investment, thereby offering benefits that extend well beyond the immediate preservation of buildings.
In conclusion, although I acknowledge that urgent housing shortages and antiquated transport systems demand attention, I maintain that investing in the restoration of historic buildings yields multifaceted dividends—preserving cultural patrimony, stimulating economic growth through tourism, and promoting environmental sustainability—that make it a worthwhile governmental priority.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use concise phrasing Original: The substantial expenditure on restoring historic edifices Suggested revision: Substantial expenditure on restoring historic buildings Why it matters: The replacement is more direct while retaining the original meaning.
- 2. Avoid redundancy Original: global metropolises Suggested revision: major cities worldwide Why it matters: Metropolises already denotes major cities, so the original wording is unnecessarily ornate.
- 3. Use natural collocation Original: necessities Suggested revision: needs Why it matters: Urban needs is a more natural collocation for housing and transport requirements.
- 4. Remove repetition Original: across major megacities Suggested revision: across megacities Why it matters: Mega already conveys large scale, so major is redundant.
- 5. Use formal wording Original: fixes Suggested revision: solutions Why it matters: Solutions maintains a more consistently formal academic register.
- 6. Reduce wordiness Original: The first reason behind my belief is that Suggested revision: One reason is that Why it matters: The shorter phrasing introduces the reason without unnecessary metadiscourse.
- 7. Improve collocation Original: steady tourist visits Suggested revision: a steady flow of tourists Why it matters: A steady flow of tourists is the natural collocation for sustained visitor numbers.
- 8. Use concise example lead Original: An illustrative example is Suggested revision: One example is Why it matters: The concise phrase introduces the example without changing its function.
- 9. Prefer literal wording Original: marry Suggested revision: combine Why it matters: Combine conveys the relationship more directly in formal academic prose.
- 10. Use accessible term Original: patrimony Suggested revision: heritage Why it matters: Cultural heritage communicates the same idea more clearly to a broad audience.
- 11. Improve noun modifier Original: governmental Suggested revision: government Why it matters: Government is the more natural noun modifier before priority.
Suggested Rewrites
- The substantial expenditure on restoring historic edifices Substantial expenditure on restoring historic buildings
- global metropolises major cities worldwide
- necessities needs
- across major megacities across megacities
- fixes solutions
- The first reason behind my belief is that One reason is that
Why this response received Band 9.0
The response presents a sophisticated, consistently maintained position and develops both immediate infrastructure needs and the long-term value of heritage with precise, controlled language. Its only notable limitation is that a few links in the heritage paragraph are somewhat formulaically signposted and the tourism claim could be evidenced more concretely; refining those transitions and adding one specific illustration would make an already compelling argument even sharper.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response fully addresses the proposition with a clear nuanced position and thoroughly developed, relevant reasons on both sides.
Add a concrete real-world heritage example to substantiate the tourism benefit and complete the already strong development.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument is exceptionally well organized, with clear paragraph purposes, controlled progression, and consistently logical connections.
Vary the short signposting sequence in the heritage paragraph so that the reasoning flows even more organically.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is exceptionally wide, precise, and natural, with sophisticated topic-specific choices used confidently throughout.
Maintain this precision while favoring the most direct term whenever a highly formal alternative adds little extra meaning.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Complex structures are varied, flexible, and virtually error-free, with punctuation supporting clarity across long sentences.
Preserve this level of control while occasionally varying sentence length to sharpen emphasis in the densest analytical passages.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
The restoration of historic buildings in major cities around the world involves significant government expenditure. These funds could be better allocated towards the development of new housing and road infrastructure. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.