It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual. Do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
It is true that many innovationsexplorations are attributednominated to a person rather than tothan to a group of people. Although all members of a team might have had equallyequal influential roles to launch a new idea, only one is regarded as the principal innovatorconsidered as the prime winner. I think this is for three reasons: havingbecause of three reasons, having a higher degree of qualifications, better networking or being more affluent. Obviously, the first reason behind it is that one individual, being credited with the innovationbeing accredited to innovation, usually hashave higher qualificationsa higher level of certifications from a highly recognised institution. As a prime example, although Bill Gates’sGate’s team played a prominent role inhad a prominent role for his achievements in the computer software, he became more successfulprosperous because his degree was from Harvard Collegethe Harvard College. Another factor is that some individuals have stronger professional networkssome individuals have better networking. Many scientists or linguistsMany of scientists or linguistics, selected for the Nobel Prizenoble prize, surpassed their coworkers working onwith the same project due to having better communication skillsbetter communications. Participating in more international meetings, these experts can find more opportunities to expose their talents to famous scientists, helping them to achieve their innovation, while this person had only been one member of a whole team. Lastly, I think money talks. Clearly, wealth plays an important role in overstatinghas an important role in overstating of the success of an individual. For instance, Anousheh Ansari, a female American-Iranian explorer, could become the first space tourist because she could afford twenty million dollars. Had she not beenHad not she been so rich, she would not have become so prosperous in this matter. She worked as a member of a team to prepare herself to fly by a spacecraft around the Earth, but she was the only one who was recognised by the press. In conclusion, instead of appreciating the whole team of innovators, sometimes a specific individual is chosen by the judge. I personally believe that having a better communication, educational position and financial backup are the reasons why one human can become more successful than the other members of a group.
Why this response received Band 5.5
The clearest strength is the use of several reasons and examples to contrast a prominent individual with the wider team, and the argument follows a recognisable sequence. However, the response mainly explains why one person receives recognition rather than whether true innovation originates from individual insight, so its position on the actual claim remains unclear. The priority is to answer that distinction directly and support it with genuinely relevant examples.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Although the essay discusses individuals and teams, it substantially misinterprets the task by focusing on recognition and personal success rather than the source of innovation.
State a direct agreement or disagreement about whether innovative ideas originate individually, then develop reasons and examples that test that precise claim.
Coherence and Cohesion
The three reasons follow a recognisable sequence, but the lack of paragraphing and some unclear references weaken progression and cohesion.
Divide the response into an introduction, focused body paragraphs, and a conclusion, giving each paragraph one clearly stated argument.
Lexical Resource
There is an attempt at varied vocabulary, but frequent inaccurate choices and collocations such as ‘explorations are nominated’ and ‘achieve their innovation’ reduce precision.
Choose simpler, accurate terms for invention, recognition, and collaboration, and check each word’s usual collocations before using it.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A range of complex forms is attempted and meaning is generally recoverable, but agreement, article, preposition, and clause-control errors recur.
Prioritise accurate subject–verb agreement and clause structure, including forms such as ‘an individual usually has’ and ‘Had she not been’.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual. Do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.