Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
As the younger generations struggle to apply for jobs, they begin to wonder if holding interviews is the best way to assess candidates. I moderately agree that in some cases, interviews are not the best method.
There are many reasons why people are skeptical about using interviews to examine candidates’ qualities. Firstly, an interview does not fully reflect candidates’ abilities, especially for candidates applying to technical positions in the IT and engineering industries. For these positions, the best way to assess their abilities is through tests, such as programming tests, case studies, or teamwork sessions with other candidates. Secondly, it is hard to evaluate candidates through interviews because they can lie. Many people admitted to having lied at least once, especially when asked about their past experiences or projects. For example, many told recruiters that they significantly contributed to projects that they hardly participated in.
However, I still think that recruiters should combine interviews with other evaluations because they are still efficient. The first advantage is that the interview gives both employers and applicants a chance to see if applicants are suitable for the company’s culture. For example, employers can observe candidates’ manners, dress codes, or attitudes, whereas candidates can see how other workers are treated. Another advantage of interviews is that they are quick and easy to conduct. Most employers will spend only 30 minutes interviewing candidates before usually giving a tour around the workplace. This is also the most direct way to communicate with applicants because both parties can discuss sensitive topics that otherwise would be inappropriate to touch on, such as salary, benefits, or workplace culture.
In conclusion, I agree that for technology companies, using only interviews as an assessment during their hiring process is not sufficient. However, recruiters should not eliminate or replace interviews.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Remove unnecessary article Original: the younger generations Suggested revision: younger generations Why it matters: The plural phrase is used generally, so it does not need the definite article.
- 2. Clarify intended meaning Original: struggle to apply for jobs Suggested revision: struggle to find jobs Why it matters: The difficulty described concerns obtaining employment rather than completing applications.
- 3. Use natural collocation Original: moderately Suggested revision: partly Why it matters: Partly agree is the more idiomatic expression for a qualified position.
- 4. Use precise wording Original: examine candidates’ qualities Suggested revision: assess candidates’ suitability Why it matters: This wording matches the specific purpose of recruitment assessment more precisely.
- 5. Avoid repetition Original: especially for candidates applying Suggested revision: especially those applying Why it matters: The pronoun removes an immediate repetition of candidates without changing the meaning.
- 6. Name assessment clearly Original: teamwork sessions with other candidates Suggested revision: group-work assessments with other candidates Why it matters: The revision makes clear that the activity is being used to evaluate applicants.
- 7. Keep tense consistent Original: admitted Suggested revision: admit Why it matters: The present tense is needed because no completed past time is specified.
- 8. Use formal construction Original: projects that they hardly participated in Suggested revision: projects in which they barely participated Why it matters: The revision uses a clearer relative construction and preserves the intended degree of involvement.
- 9. Use precise noun Original: combine interviews with other evaluations Suggested revision: combine interviews with other assessment methods Why it matters: Assessment methods refers more clearly to the additional hiring tools being proposed.
- 10. Clarify pronoun reference Original: because they are still efficient Suggested revision: because interviews remain efficient Why it matters: Naming interviews removes possible ambiguity about what they refers to.
- 11. Use general article Original: the Suggested revision: an Why it matters: A singular countable noun used as a general example requires the indefinite article.
- 12. Choose observable noun Original: manners, dress codes, or attitudes Suggested revision: manners, dress, or attitudes Why it matters: Employers can observe a candidate's dress, whereas a dress code is a set of rules.
Suggested Rewrites
- the younger generations younger generations
- struggle to apply for jobs struggle to find jobs
- moderately partly
- examine candidates’ qualities assess candidates’ suitability
- especially for candidates applying especially those applying
- teamwork sessions with other candidates group-work assessments with other candidates
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response is strongest when it presents a balanced, clearly organized case for retaining interviews alongside practical assessments, supported by relevant workplace examples. Its main limitation is that the position shifts from a broad moderate agreement to a narrower conclusion about technology companies, weakening precision. The priority is to define the scope of the judgement consistently and develop each reason in direct relation to that position.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response addresses the issue, presents a qualified position, and supports both the limitations and continuing value of interviews with relevant explanations and examples.
Keep the final judgement aligned with the essay’s broader scope instead of narrowing it mainly to technology companies.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument is easy to follow, with clear paragraph purposes and logical movement from criticisms of interviews to reasons for retaining them.
Use less mechanical enumeration and strengthen the logical bridge between interview efficiency and the separate benefit of assessing cultural fit.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is sufficiently varied and generally precise for the topic, although several choices and collocations sound slightly awkward or repetitive.
Use more natural expressions for evaluating qualities, candidates’ appearance, and discussing sensitive subjects, while reducing repeated references to interviews and candidates.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The essay uses a good range of complex structures with generally accurate control, and the occasional awkward construction does not impede meaning.
Review tense choice in general statements and streamline heavily modified sentences so their grammatical relationships remain fully natural.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.