Should state museums charge visiting fees or that should be completely free? What is your viewpoint on this issue?
Sample Response
Globally, many museums charge visitorsevery museum charges its visitors for visiting museumsthe museums. It creates a difference between the rich and the poorhave and have not Deletepoor sentence formation. Everyone should be given an opportunity to know about his or herhis /her native country's culture. Moreover, a larger number of local peoplemore numbers of local people visit museums when we compare them with peoplemake an analogy to people who make special trips to visit them. So, in this way citizens of a nation could also share and understand the heritage of their homeland. Affordability to visit museums should not be hindered just because of financial hurdles. As a result, these museumsAs a result of these museums could have both foreigners and locals visiting them. On the other hand, it is quite a difficult task for state museums to maintain and add collections for our cultural heritage. They would have to compete with other public needscompete with other necessities of people like education, hospitals, and transporthospitals etc. for allocation of the budget provided by the government. State museums would face quite a lot of difficulties to renovate and add collections to the nation's existing collectionsexisting nation's fortune. Moreover, the number of visitors could damage the property of museums. So, the number of visitors should be limited regarding the safety of historic collectionsyears old collections of museums. This act is an obstacle for maintenance of museums. Hence, state museums are left with no option but to chargeleft with no option of neglecting to charge visitors for their visit. In summary, I believe something should be done for citizens of a country in order to recognise the heritage of this nation. Children should be allowed free entryallowed a free entry to museums besides adults should be charged for their visits. Nevertheless, financial factors should not play a dominant role for citizens to notice their homeland's fortune.
Why this response received Band 5.5
The response’s strongest feature is its recognition of both affordable public access and the genuine cost of maintaining museums, leading to a workable compromise. Its main limitation is that weakly supported points, one-block organisation, awkward expressions, and frequent sentence-level errors obscure the reasoning. Prioritise stating the compromise in the introduction, then develop it in clear paragraphs with concrete policy details and carefully revised sentences.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response discusses both free access and the need for museum funding, and gives a compromise view, but some points are unclear or weakly supported.
State your compromise in the introduction and support it with concrete policy details, such as free entry for residents or children and fees for tourists.
Coherence and Cohesion
There is a logical contrast, but the essay is one block and some sentences are inserted awkwardly, including an obvious stray phrase.
Use separate paragraphs and remove unrelated or drafting text that interrupts the argument.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is adequate for public services and heritage, but several expressions are unnatural or inaccurate.
Use clearer terms such as admission fees, public funding, maintenance costs, cultural heritage, and affordable access.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Errors with articles, sentence boundaries, prepositions, and noun phrases occur throughout, though meaning is usually recoverable.
Revise sentence by sentence for complete clauses and natural noun groups.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Should state museums charge visiting fees or that should be completely free? What is your viewpoint on this issue?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.