Some people think that the public health of a country can be improved if the government make laws regarding nutritious food but others think that it is a matter of personal choice and personal responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Response
Healthy living and the government's role in it is a great concern for many. Some opine that the government needs to pass laws regarding nutritious food intake to improve public health, while others oppose this idea as they believe that it is a matter of individual choice. The following paragraphs will shed some light on this debate. In my opinion, however, campaigns and school education, instead of laws, can bring better results.
On the one hand, a healthy lifestyle is an individual's choice and habita choice and habit of an individual. No matter how many laws are passed and how strictly the government monitors food quality if a person does not follow a healthy lifestyle and eating habits, he or she will suffer from health-related problems today or tomorrow. Thus the choices of individuals greatly affect the overall health condition of a nation. Making laws to force people to eat nutritiousnutritional food is impractical, and governments in developing countries can never implement that policy.
On the other hand, the use of chemicals, preservatives and additives in food productsadhesives in food items should be banned, and highermore taxes should be imposed on unhealthy fast food. Only the government can ensure that. In this regard, laws can improve the quality of food that citizens consumethe food quality that citizens intake. Even with a proper diet and regular exerciseEven after having a proper diet and regular exercise, if people are forced to eat food containing harmful chemicalsfoods that have chemicals and harmful ingredients, they could suffer from serious illnesseswould suffer from dangerous diseases. Using unauthorised chemicals, and selling expired and low-quality foods should be halted by the authorities, andby the authority and more stringent laws are needed for that.
In my opinion, instead of making new laws to force ordinary citizens to eat what the state believes is healthy, frequent campaigns can make people aware of eating unhealthily. The government should also focus on educating youth students to learn about healthy eating habits so that they become responsible adults whoto follow a healthy lifestyle and proper diets. This, in my opinion, would bring far better results in the long run.
To conclude, citizens of a country have to follow a healthy lifestyle and eat nutritious food to stay fit and productive. But instead of making laws and forcing them, the state authority can educate them and monitor the market to ensure food safetyensure it.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response’s strongest feature is its nuanced distinction between regulating harmful food production and forcing individuals to eat particular foods, while proposing education and campaigns as a practical alternative. Its main limitation is occasional imprecision and an underexplained tension between opposing new laws and endorsing bans and taxes. The highest priority is to state a precise policy principle that reconciles these measures and consistently frames the government’s appropriate role.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both views are fully explored and the writer offers a clear, developed position combining personal responsibility, education, and regulation of the food market.
Explicitly distinguish laws that control producers from laws that dictate consumers’ diets so the qualified position cannot appear contradictory.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay progresses logically through focused paragraphs on personal choice, regulation, education, and the final synthesis, with effective cohesion.
Make the transition into the writer’s preferred solution more comparative by directly weighing education against coercive dietary laws.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied and generally precise across public health, regulation, nutrition, and education, with a few awkward or inaccurate choices.
Replace ‘adhesives’ with ‘additives’, ‘food quality that citizens intake’ with ‘the quality of food citizens consume’, and ‘youth students’ with ‘young people’.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex structures is used with good control, though occasional agreement, punctuation, and clause-attachment errors remain.
Check compound subjects and subordinate clauses, particularly ‘healthy living and the government’s role are’ and the conditional sentence about monitoring food quality.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that the public health of a country can be improved if the government make laws regarding nutritious food but others think that it is a matter of personal choice and personal responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.