Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
This response is estimated at Band 8.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
At present, there are thousands of languages being spoken in many regionsthe many regions of the globe. However, perhaps in the foreseeable future, only one common language will exist as a means of communication. In my opinion, although this development would help to increase international communicationcommunications, it would be highly detrimental to the diversity of our species.
If we all spoke the same language, it would be athe bridge to harmony and understanding between different cultures and countries. It would eliminate the key hurdle that keeps groups of people separate because we all have a sense of familiarity through language. We could therefore better comprehend different cultures that might otherwise be misinterpretedthat used to be somewhat misinterpreted due to a linguistic barrier.
Nevertheless, if there were one common language, a part of a country’s core identity would be sacrificed. Language is not onlyLanguage not only is the way people living in the same society communicate but also symbolizes their origins and defining characteristics. Vietnamese people, for example, are known for their heroismhave been known for their heroism and patriotism through the words of their anthems, while most people think of France as a land of romance because French is considered to be the language of love.
Cultural diversity and historical values would also be at stakewould also be put at stake as a consequence of this trend. Dialects in different parts of a countryDialects in any part of a country carry unique stories and lessons of the past which are closely linked to religions, beliefs, and lifestyles. And a world that uses only one language would be the ground for the likely unfortunate disappearance of those precious aspects of life.
In conclusion, although a single global language would help to reduceease language barriers between nations, I believe it would be a major threat to human identity, culture and history.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response presents a clear negative judgement while thoughtfully acknowledging the main benefit of a shared language, and its ideas are developed through relevant cultural examples. The main limitation is occasional awkward or imprecise phrasing, particularly when describing global communication and cultural disappearance. The best improvement would be to refine those collocations and tighten a few formulations so the strong argument sounds consistently natural and exact.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The question is fully addressed through a clear position, balanced consideration, and well-developed relevant support.
Strengthen the final negative case further by explaining more explicitly why cultural loss outweighs improved communication.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas progress logically through well-focused paragraphs, with cohesive devices used clearly and effectively.
Integrate the final body paragraph more smoothly with the preceding identity argument to make the progression even tighter.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied and precise overall, with only occasional awkward combinations that do not impede meaning.
Refine expressions such as increase international communication and create conditions for cultural disappearance for greater naturalness.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex structures is handled accurately, with only minor lapses or awkward constructions.
Polish article use and word order in the few less natural sentences to achieve more consistent control.