Some people say that with the increasing popularity of online media and popular streaming services, the TV will no longer be a household item in the future. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The growing popularity of online media and popular streaming services has sparked a debate about the future of traditional television as a household item. In my view, I agree that the prominence of online media and streaming services will likely diminish the significance of television as a household item in the future due to those streaming services and online media's convenience and diverse content offerings over televisions.
One compelling reason supporting this perspective is the convenience and flexibility offered by online media and streaming services. With the advent of high-speed internet and the proliferation of smart devices, people can access their favourite shows and movies anytime, anywhere. Unlike traditional television, which follows fixed schedules and limited content choices, online media platforms offer on-demand content, allowing viewers to customize their viewing experience according to their preferences and schedules. This flexibility is highly appealing to modern consumers, especially those with busy lifestyles.
Furthermore, popular streaming services have revolutionized the way content is delivered and consumed. These platforms invest heavily in producing high-quality, original content that resonates with diverse audiences. As a result, they have attracted a massive global subscriber base, cutting across geographical boundaries. The ease of access to a vast library of content, including movies, TV series, documentaries, and educational programmes, makes streaming services an all-encompassing entertainment and education option that traditional television cannot compete with. For instance, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video have become household names, providing a wide range of content genres catering to diverse interests. The convenience of binge-watching entire series at once and the availability of international content have reshaped how people consume media.
In conclusion, the increasing popularity of online media and popular streaming services is likely to diminish the role of traditional television as a household item in the future. The convenience, flexibility, and diverse content offerings of these digital platforms have transformed the way people access and enjoy entertainment, leading to a gradual shift away from traditional television viewing habits. As technology continues to evolve and streaming services continue to innovate, the future of television as a household item remains uncertain.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use concise phrasing Original: One compelling reason supporting this perspective is Suggested revision: One compelling reason for this view is Why it matters: The revision expresses the same transition more directly.
- 2. Restore parallel verbs Original: which follows fixed schedules and limited content choices Suggested revision: which operates on fixed schedules and offers limited content choices Why it matters: Television can operate on a schedule and offer choices, but it cannot follow choices.
- 3. Improve collocation Original: according to their preferences and schedules Suggested revision: to suit their preferences and schedules Why it matters: Suit is a more natural verb for adapting a viewing experience to personal needs.
- 4. Remove unnecessary comma Original: high-quality, original content Suggested revision: high-quality original content Why it matters: The cumulative adjectives jointly describe content and do not require a comma.
- 5. Use measured wording Original: massive Suggested revision: large Why it matters: Large is more precise and appropriately formal in this context.
- 6. Improve parallel wording Original: all-encompassing entertainment and education option Suggested revision: comprehensive entertainment and educational option Why it matters: Educational provides parallel adjectival modification alongside entertainment.
- 7. Remove redundancy Original: content genres Suggested revision: genres Why it matters: Genre already means a category of content, so content is unnecessary.
- 8. Clarify modifier Original: catering to diverse interests Suggested revision: that cater to diverse interests Why it matters: A relative clause clearly links the action to the plural noun genres.
- 9. Sentence rewrite Original: In my view, I agree that the prominence of online media and streaming services will likely diminish the significance of television as a household item in the future due to those streaming services and online media's convenience and diverse content offerings over televisions. Suggested revision: I agree that the convenience and varied content of online media and streaming services will probably make traditional television less significant as a household item. Why it matters: The rewrite removes repetition, repairs the awkward possessive, and states the same claim clearly.
- 10. Tighten example progression Suggested revision: Link the Netflix and Amazon example directly to the claim about content variety, then remove the repeated general statement about convenience. Why it matters: This would give the paragraph a more linear claim-to-example progression and reduce repetition.
Suggested Rewrites
- One compelling reason supporting this perspective is One compelling reason for this view is
- which follows fixed schedules and limited content choices which operates on fixed schedules and offers limited content choices
- according to their preferences and schedules to suit their preferences and schedules
- high-quality, original content high-quality original content
- massive large
- all-encompassing entertainment and education option comprehensive entertainment and educational option
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response develops a coherent, well-supported argument through fluent comparison of streaming services with traditional television, and its language is consistently varied and controlled. The main weakness is that the stated position shifts between television becoming less significant and its future remaining uncertain, rather than directly settling whether it will cease to be a household item. Sharpen the degree of agreement and maintain that exact claim through the conclusion.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Relevant reasons are thoroughly developed and supported, but the position does not consistently resolve the prompt’s stronger prediction that televisions will disappear from households.
State precisely whether you fully or partly agree with that prediction and preserve the same degree of certainty in the conclusion.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay is logically sequenced, well paragraphed, and smoothly connected, with each body paragraph developing a clear central idea.
Trim repeated references to convenience and content variety so the progression remains equally concise throughout.
Lexical Resource
A wide and flexible vocabulary conveys ideas precisely, with only occasional awkward phrasing and repetition.
Replace clumsy comparative phrases such as ‘content offerings over televisions’ with more natural, concise wording.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A broad range of complex structures is handled accurately, and the great majority of sentences are error-free.
Refine occasional awkward possessive and comparative constructions while maintaining the existing grammatical range.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people say that with the increasing popularity of online media and popular streaming services, the TV will no longer be a household item in the future. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.