Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages?
Sample Response
Good health is undeniably a cornerstone of a fulfilling life, and many argue that it should be safeguarded from profit-driven interests. While there might be some valid concerns about the morality of this business model, I firmly believe that the advantages are far more significant.
Critics of private healthcare often express ethical concerns related to the profit-driven nature of these institutions. They may argue that profit motives in private healthcare can sometimes give rise to overmedicalization and unnecessary procedures. In a competitive market, there may be incentives to recommend additional tests or treatments, potentially exposing patients to risks and financial burdens. These concerns, however, are often limited to the very most extreme situations, and not applicable to the vast majority of private healthcare facilities which still successfully maintain high ethical standards, prioritizing patient welfare over profit margins, and delivering quality care without unnecessary intervention.
In my opinion, private healthcare can be more beneficial in terms of a higher quality of services and individualized experiences. Private institutions often compete for patients, driving them to invest in state-of-the-art facilities, employ skilled professionals, and adopt cutting-edge treatments, resulting in quicker access to care, reduced waiting times, and a broader range of treatment options. Additionally, private healthcare can offer a level of personalized attention and comfort that may be lacking in public facilities. With a lower patient-to-staff ratio, medical practitioners can devote more time to individual cases, enabling tailored treatment plans for patient well-being.
In conclusion, although there might be some instances where profit motives may lead to overmedicalization, these cases represent the exception rather than the rule. The potential for higher quality services and personalized care make private healthcare a valuable complement to public services.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Remove weak qualifier Original: some valid concerns Suggested revision: valid concerns Why it matters: Removing some makes the concession more direct without changing its meaning.
- 2. Use precise terminology Original: morality Suggested revision: ethics Why it matters: Ethics is the more natural term for evaluating professional business conduct.
- 3. Use concise wording Original: can sometimes give rise to Suggested revision: can lead to Why it matters: The shorter phrase conveys the causal relationship more directly.
- 4. Use specific wording Original: individualized experiences Suggested revision: personalized care Why it matters: This phrase identifies the relevant healthcare benefit more precisely.
- 5. Remove wordiness Original: a level of personalized attention Suggested revision: personalized attention Why it matters: The phrase a level of adds no useful meaning here.
- 6. Clarify the agent Original: enabling tailored treatment plans for patient well-being Suggested revision: enabling them to develop tailored treatment plans that support patient well-being Why it matters: Adding the agent and verb makes the resulting action grammatically explicit.
- 7. Fix subject-verb agreement Original: make Suggested revision: makes Why it matters: The singular subject potential requires the singular verb makes.
- 8. Reduce formulaic wording Original: undeniably a cornerstone of a fulfilling life Suggested revision: central to a fulfilling life Why it matters: The revision states the importance of health more directly and concisely.
- 9. Name the actor Original: profit-driven interests Suggested revision: profit-driven healthcare providers Why it matters: The specific noun identifies who might place profit above patient welfare.
- 10. Complete the comparison Original: far more significant Suggested revision: far more significant than the disadvantages Why it matters: Stating the comparison target makes the position fully explicit.
- 11. Use concise phrasing Original: ethical concerns related to the profit-driven nature Suggested revision: ethical concerns about the profit-driven nature Why it matters: The preposition about expresses the relationship more directly.
- 12. Sentence rewrite Original: These concerns, however, are often limited to the very most extreme situations, and not applicable to the vast majority of private healthcare facilities which still successfully maintain high ethical standards, prioritizing patient welfare over profit margins, and delivering quality care without unnecessary intervention. Suggested revision: These concerns, however, are often limited to the most extreme situations and do not apply to the vast majority of private healthcare facilities, which maintain high ethical standards, prioritise patient welfare over profit margins, and deliver quality care without unnecessary intervention. Why it matters: The rewrite removes redundancy and repairs the incomplete coordinated predicate.
Suggested Rewrites
- some valid concerns valid concerns
- morality ethics
- can sometimes give rise to can lead to
- individualized experiences personalized care
- a level of personalized attention personalized attention
- enabling tailored treatment plans for patient well-being enabling them to develop tailored treatment plans that support patient well-being
Why this response received Band 7.5
The response presents a clear position and develops a coherent comparison, with especially effective explanation of how competition can improve service quality and personalised care. The main limitation is that the disadvantage is dismissed as exceptional without enough support, so the weighing feels slightly asserted; directly comparing the scale or likelihood of the identified harm with the benefits would make the conclusion more convincing.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response addresses both advantages and disadvantages, maintains a clear position, and develops the principal benefits in relevant detail.
Justify why overmedicalisation is less significant by explicitly weighing its prevalence or severity against the stated benefits.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument progresses clearly from position to disadvantage, advantages, and conclusion, with cohesive links managed effectively.
Shorten the long final sentence of the disadvantage paragraph so its concession and rebuttal are easier to follow.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied and generally precise, including effective language for ethics, competition, treatment, and patient care.
Replace slightly awkward combinations such as very most extreme situations and individualized experiences with more natural phrasing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Complex sentences are frequent and mostly well controlled, with only occasional agreement and sentence-structure lapses.
Check agreement in phrases such as the potential ... makes and avoid attaching a non-finite list to an already overloaded sentence.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.