Some people think that only those animals that are useful to humans should be protected. Others believe that all animals should be protected. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Sample Response
OpinionsOponions differ over whether protectingprotecing those animals that are beneficial to humans or all animals should be preserved. While the former can avoid the extinction of a certain creature in a short time, I favour the latter because its long-termtrem benefits to the biodiversity and preservationpreservetion of the most species in our planet.
Those who support only protecting useful animals often point out that our budgets are limitedpoint to our budgets are limited, and we should concentrate our funds on protectingconcentrate our money to protect creatures that directly benefit us in fields of scientific research, health care and industrial productionproducation. However, protection provided to those which do not benefit us directly will reduce budgets to these creatures. In contexts where the certain creatures are extremely endangered and its connectionendangered and the its connection with other animals is weak, this approach can use limited budgets to ensure its safety. For example, pandas used to be a seriously endangered animal, but after gaining the most concentration from Chinese people and protection of governments, its population increased quickly to over thousands.
Nevertheless, the case for protectingprotect all animals is stronger. Every creature is an important part of our biological system. They have their own missions in maintainingmaintainning the stability of environmental balance. Any creatures which seem to be useless may have positive or negativenagetive influence to other animals. They protect the biological balance togethertogerther. Any creature which seems to be useless becoming extinct can causeuseless extincts can cause serious harm to a certain area. For example, AustraliaAustrilia used to hunt wolves to protect rabbits, leading to a dramatic increase in the number of local rabbits.robbits, it leads to dramatic increase of the number of local robbits. As a resultresults, rabbits eat a large variety ofrobbits eat a large kinds of plants which are important food resource for other creatures, making these plants and animals extinctexticnt. Therefore, the long-term benefit of protecting all animals to maintainmaintian the biological system outweighs the short-term protection for only useful animals. Inconclusion, both positions offer clear benefits; on balance, however, protecting all animals is preferable because it maintains a sustainable biological system and sources.
Why this response received Band 6.5
文章清晰地讨论了两种观点并阐明了自己的立场,论据切题且例证较为具体。主要局限在于拼写错误较多以及部分句式存在语法结构瑕疵。当务之急是加强拼写检查并规范复杂句的语法连接,以提升整体语言的准确性。
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
任务回应
文章完整回应了题目要求,深入讨论了两种观点并提出了明确自洽的个人立场。
可以进一步精炼例证细节,确保引用的例证在逻辑和事实层面更加严密。
连贯与衔接
文章结构清晰,分段合理,段落内部和段落之间的衔接自然顺畅。
注意标点与连接词的规范使用,如避免将“Inconclusion”写成一个单词。
词汇资源
文章使用了较丰富的环境保护相关词汇,但拼写错误较为频繁,影响了词汇准确度。
重点纠正常见词汇的拼写错误,如将“long-trem”改为“long-term”、“robbits”改为“rabbits”。
语法多样性与准确性
文章展现了多样的句式结构,但存在介词后动词形式错误及从句连接不规范等语法瑕疵。
加强对介词后接动名词(如“case for protecting”)以及介词/冠词误用(如“the its”)等基础语法的检查。
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that only those animals that are useful to humans should be protected. Others believe that all animals should be protected. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.