Some people have decided to reduce the number of times they fly every year or to stop flying altogether. Do you think the environmental benefits of this development outweigh the disadvantages for individuals and businesses?

It is clear that people pay more attention 1toon the 2sustainabilitysustainablity of the fossil 3energyenerge to protect the environment. Thus, some people have decided to fly less or to stop flying altogether for the goal. Although this activity could mitigate the pollution virtually, its disadvantages could have a more severe implication on individuals and businesses.

Taking 4airplanesairplan less or 5stoppingstoping flying might be a good method to help the environment recover. Actually, this 6actionacting indeed 7reducesreduce the 8emissionemmision of toxic gases of airplane, making the air quality improved 9to some extentin some extend. However, it is not the most effective approach to enhance the environmental condition. For example, 10a businessman hasbusinessman has to travel to a different country to attend a conference or forum when the distance is 11fartherfartherr. 12Furthermore, the airplaneFurthermore, airplane is the only time-saving way to meet his need. In other 13wordsword, this suggestion is feasible but temporary, which can not surmount this environmental problem effectively.

Admittedly, disadvantageous effects are more obvious compared to the merit. 15Stop flying is unrealistic 16nowadaysnowdays for the businessman, because it is 17impossibleimposible that takes a week on the way to meet their client. In that case, the businessman's company will become less competent, reducing the profit of the firm. Additionally, if tourists decide to visit the nearby region by train or bus, it will bring 18ana adverse implication on the international tourism. The visitors basically have employment, which means they are not able to spend a long time on the road due to their limited vacation. As a result, some 19cities that relycities rely on tourism will receive 20fewerless travellers, then the local economy would face financial problems, such as income decline and 21fewer jobsless employments.

In conclusion, reducing or stopping the frequency of taking airplane can visually improve the air quality, but it is unrealistic for attending an international meeting and can do detrimental effect on some tourists cities. In my 22opinionoppinion, it is not an effective and permanent method to carry on.