It is often argued by many that historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The repatriation of historical artefacts to their country of origin is a topic that raises important ethical and cultural considerations. Many express their opinion in favour of the return of such objects, and I firmly agree with this opinion as I believe that restoring these items to their rightful place is a crucial step in preserving cultural heritage and fostering international understanding.
First and foremost, returning historical artefacts to their country of origin is a matter of cultural identity and respect. Many artefacts hold deep significance to their country of origin, representing their history, traditions, and cultural narratives. These items often play a central role in shaping a nation's identity and can contribute to a stronger sense of unity among its people. For instance, the Elgin Marbles, removed from the Parthenon in Athens and housed in the British Museum, are symbols of Greek heritage, and their repatriation would signify the acknowledgement of Greece's historical legacy.
Furthermore, repatriation can facilitate greater international cooperation and understanding. By returning artefacts, countries demonstrate respect for each other's history and cultural values, fostering goodwill and collaboration. This approach contrasts with the perception of colonialism and exploitation that may arise when valuable cultural items are retained by foreign institutions. The restitution of artefacts can help build bridges between nations and contribute to cultural diplomacy, promoting mutual respect and dialogue.
In conclusion, the repatriation of historical artefacts to their country of origin is a matter of cultural preservation, identity, and international harmony. The return of these items acknowledges their cultural significance and fosters a sense of unity among people. Additionally, it promotes cross-cultural understanding and collaboration between nations. As such, the practice of returning historical artefacts is not only a matter of ethical responsibility but also a means to strengthen global cultural connections.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Fix preposition Original: hold deep significance to Suggested revision: hold deep significance for Why it matters: Significance takes for when naming the people or country to whom something matters.
- 2. Clarify the pronoun Original: representing their history, traditions, and cultural narratives Suggested revision: representing the country's history, traditions, and cultural narratives Why it matters: Their can incorrectly appear to refer to the artefacts rather than the country.
- 3. Make opening direct Original: is a topic that raises important ethical and cultural considerations Suggested revision: raises important ethical and cultural questions Why it matters: The direct verb removes a wordy topic-that-raises construction.
- 4. Use concise wording Original: Many express their opinion in favour of the return of such objects Suggested revision: Many people support returning such objects Why it matters: The revision states the same position more directly.
- 5. Remove repeated stance Original: I firmly agree with this opinion as I believe that Suggested revision: I firmly agree because Why it matters: Agree and believe duplicate the same stance before the reason is given.
- 6. Use precise reference Original: restoring these items to their rightful place Suggested revision: returning these items to their countries of origin Why it matters: The revision names the destination explicitly instead of using the evaluative phrase rightful place.
- 7. Use concise signpost Original: First and foremost Suggested revision: First Why it matters: First provides sufficient sequencing without the added emphasis of foremost.
- 8. Use active wording Original: is a matter of cultural identity and respect Suggested revision: supports cultural identity and demonstrates respect Why it matters: The active verbs express the two stated effects more clearly.
- 9. Use concise verb Original: are symbols of Greek heritage Suggested revision: symbolise Greek heritage Why it matters: The single verb expresses the same relationship more concisely.
- 10. Replace noun phrase Original: signify the acknowledgement of Suggested revision: acknowledge Why it matters: The direct verb avoids an unnecessarily abstract noun construction.
- 11. Reduce repeated framing Suggested revision: Trim repeated references to country of origin and cultural identity before moving to the Greek example. Why it matters: This would make the progression from the general point to the example more efficient.
- 12. Combine overlapping opening points Suggested revision: Combine the opening statements about cooperation, respect, goodwill, and collaboration before presenting the colonialism contrast. Why it matters: The first two sentences currently cover closely related functions and slow the progression.
Suggested Rewrites
- hold deep significance to hold deep significance for
- representing their history, traditions, and cultural narratives representing the country's history, traditions, and cultural narratives
- is a topic that raises important ethical and cultural considerations raises important ethical and cultural questions
- Many express their opinion in favour of the return of such objects Many people support returning such objects
- I firmly agree with this opinion as I believe that I firmly agree because
- restoring these items to their rightful place returning these items to their countries of origin
Why this response received Band 8.5
The essay maintains a fully consistent position and develops two distinct, relevant lines of reasoning: cultural identity is supported by a precise Elgin Marbles example, while restitution is linked coherently to diplomacy and post-colonial respect. Its only notable limitation is that the cooperation argument remains more abstract than the first; strengthen it with a concrete restitution case or briefly address a practical objection such as preservation capacity or disputed ownership.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Detailed feedback by IELTS writing criterion after the annotated essay.
Task Response
The response directly answers the extent question with a firm position and develops two well-supported arguments concerning cultural identity and international relations.
Deepen the second argument with a specific example or briefly acknowledge and rebut a practical complication surrounding ownership or conservation.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing, topic sentences, referencing and transitions produce a highly logical progression from position through two distinct reasons to a synthesised conclusion.
Reduce minor repetition in the conclusion by combining its restatement of identity, unity, understanding and collaboration into a sharper final synthesis.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is wide, precise and consistently appropriate, with assured use of terms such as repatriation, restitution, cultural diplomacy and historical legacy.
For further refinement, vary repeated uses of artefacts and cultural while preserving the essay’s exact topic terminology.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex structures is used accurately and flexibly, with only very minor lapses in reference or phrasing.
Tighten plural reference in phrases such as artefacts and their country of origin, and keep each pronoun’s antecedent unmistakable.
Use this task for your next draft
Feedback is more useful when you actively apply it in a draft, rather than only recognising improvements on the page.
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.
The question will be loaded automatically.