Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life. Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals, companies, and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Response
Whether employees should jump from one job to another or they should work at the same position throughout their career has been a controversial topic. In my opinion, while changing jobs can be beneficial to a certain extent, being in a similar position is more advantageous to both the individual and the employer.
On the one hand, career changes can benefit employees in many ways. First, job hoppers can hone diverse skills and possess an expansive knowledge spanning across different fields. As each position requires unique abilities, when switching jobs, employees can master a new skill, which can be of importance to positions that entails cross-department communication and cooperation. Moreover, individuals who change jobs often will be less likely to become jobless, as their diverse skill set can be applied in any post. For instance, during the Covid-19 pandemic, people who had additional knowledge in a field different from their job can find new positions once personnel reduction took place.
On the other hand, advocates of working constantly in one post have firm grounds to argue that this trend has numerous positive effects. Concerning individuals, being loyal to a position means that their incentives are high, including seniority bonuses as well as labor insurance. Whereas job hoppers can never expect this as their short-term work will always put their benefits at a new employee level. As for companies, having faithful employees can help them cut training costs and avoid problems that can arise from newcomers. When a new member joins the team, the company has to pay for their lack of efficiency and experience. This is not the case of longtime employees, whose incentives are only tools to motivate them to achieve greater success, not a retribution on the company for their senior employees’ mistakes.
In conclusion, while it is fair to argue that jumping between jobs can help individuals broaden their skill set, working in one position constantly can have numerous positive effects on both the employees and the employers.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use concise phrasing Original: an expansive knowledge spanning across different fields Suggested revision: broad knowledge spanning different fields Why it matters: Broad knowledge is the natural collocation, and spanning does not require across.
- 2. Match subject and verb Original: entails Suggested revision: entail Why it matters: The plural antecedent positions requires the plural verb entail.
- 3. Avoid absolute prediction Original: will Suggested revision: may Why it matters: May appropriately qualifies a general prediction whose outcome is not certain.
- 4. Use natural phrasing Original: working constantly in one post Suggested revision: remaining in one position Why it matters: Remaining in one position is a more natural expression for occupational continuity.
- 5. Clarify the benefit Original: their incentives are high Suggested revision: they receive substantial benefits Why it matters: Benefits can be substantial, whereas incentives are not naturally described as high in this context.
- 6. Use workplace term Original: faithful employees Suggested revision: long-serving employees Why it matters: Long-serving precisely describes employees who remain with a company without implying personal faithfulness.
- 7. Clarify the cost Original: pay for their lack of efficiency and experience Suggested revision: bear the cost of their lower efficiency and lack of experience Why it matters: The revision makes clear that the company bears costs arising from both limitations.
- 8. Sentence rewrite Original: Whether employees should jump from one job to another or they should work at the same position throughout their career has been a controversial topic. Suggested revision: Whether employees should move from one job to another or remain in the same position throughout their careers has long been controversial. Why it matters: The rewrite creates a parallel whether-or structure and corrects the preposition and number.
- 9. Sentence rewrite Original: For instance, during the Covid-19 pandemic, people who had additional knowledge in a field different from their job can find new positions once personnel reduction took place. Suggested revision: For instance, during the Covid-19 pandemic, people with knowledge in a field different from their main job were able to find new positions when staff reductions occurred. Why it matters: The rewrite keeps the example consistently in the past and replaces unnatural phrases.
- 10. Sentence rewrite Original: Whereas job hoppers can never expect this as their short-term work will always put their benefits at a new employee level. Suggested revision: Job hoppers, however, may not receive these benefits because their short-term employment repeatedly places them at the level of new employees. Why it matters: The rewrite turns the dependent fragment into a complete sentence and clarifies the comparison.
Suggested Rewrites
- an expansive knowledge spanning across different fields broad knowledge spanning different fields
- entails entail
- will may
- working constantly in one post remaining in one position
- their incentives are high they receive substantial benefits
- faithful employees long-serving employees
Why this response received Band 6.5
The response is logically organized, maintains a clear preference, and develops both career mobility and job stability with relevant reasoning. Its main task limitation is the lack of discussion of benefits to society, while several awkward collocations and grammatical slips reduce precision. The highest priority is to extend the same-job argument to the societal dimension and express that support in more natural, carefully controlled language.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both views and a clear opinion are developed, but the requested societal benefits of staying in one job are not addressed.
Add a developed explanation of how long-term employment may benefit society and connect it directly to the stated opinion.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay follows a clear paragraph structure and logical progression, with generally effective signposting despite a few awkward local links.
Integrate dependent clauses such as the sentence beginning with “Whereas” into complete sentences and clarify occasional references.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied and topic-appropriate overall, but several unnatural collocations and mischosen words weaken accuracy.
Replace expressions such as “work at the same position” and “retribution on the company” with precise, natural workplace vocabulary.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses varied complex structures, though agreement, tense, punctuation, and sentence-fragment errors recur.
Proofread complex sentences for clause completeness, subject-verb agreement, and consistent tense before finalizing the response.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life. Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals, companies, and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.