Some people say that a lot of scientific research done today is a waste of time and money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
It is sometimes argued that much contemporary scientific research wastes public funds and time. Despite the inefficiencies and access barriers which mar some projects, I believe that the long-term benefits of well-targeted research far outweigh these drawbacks and merit continued investment.
Some scientific endeavours struggle to justify their costs or deliver clear practical returns. First, misallocation of resources can occur when large budgets are devoted to projects with minimal application or relevance to everyday needs. For example, funding allocated to highly specialised experiments—particularly in obscure theoretical fields—may divert attention and resources from more pressing priorities, such as public health or infrastructure improvements. As a result, poor prioritisation can lead to public dissatisfaction and growing concerns about wasted taxpayer money. Second, a lack of transparency and accessibility further weakens the impact of research. Many findings are hidden behind expensive journal paywalls, while some studies—especially those yielding negative results—are never published at all. Consequently, this limited access hinders the wider societal benefit of scientific inquiry and slows the spread of potentially valuable knowledge.
Despite these shortcomings, well-directed scientific research yields innovations that are essential to long-term human progress. Studies in fields such as medicine, energy, and the environment play a critical role in addressing global challenges. By way of illustration, research on vaccine development, renewable technologies, and pollution control has proven instrumental in combating disease and mitigating climate change. Consequently, such breakthroughs improve public health, enhance sustainability, and raise quality of life on a global scale. Moreover, investing in frontier areas like space exploration and artificial intelligence fosters future economic development. Early research on satellites and machine learning, for example, has laid the foundation for global communications networks and automation industries. Therefore, continued funding for science not only drives immediate problem-solving but also prepares society for the demands and opportunities of the future.
In conclusion, although some research projects suffer from misallocation and restricted dissemination, I maintain that the profound, long-term benefits of scientific innovation—ranging from lifesaving medicines to transformative technologies—substantially outweigh these drawbacks.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Improve collocation Original: access barriers Suggested revision: barriers to access Why it matters: This is the more idiomatic phrase for obstacles that restrict access.
- 2. Clarify possession Original: wasted taxpayer money Suggested revision: wasted taxpayers' money Why it matters: The possessive form makes clear that the money belongs collectively to taxpayers.
- 3. Use precise noun Original: accessibility Suggested revision: access Why it matters: “Access” refers more directly to whether readers can obtain the research.
- 4. Improve abstract phrasing Original: hinders the wider societal benefit Suggested revision: limits the broader societal benefits Why it matters: The revised collocation and plural noun better express multiple public gains.
- 5. Make list parallel Original: fields such as medicine, energy, and the environment Suggested revision: fields such as medicine, energy, and environmental science Why it matters: Naming three fields creates a grammatically and conceptually parallel list.
- 6. Keep British usage Original: proven Suggested revision: proved Why it matters: “Has proved” is more consistent with the essay's British English spelling conventions.
- 7. Add definite article Original: raise quality of life Suggested revision: raise the quality of life Why it matters: The fixed expression normally requires “the” before “quality of life.”
- 8. Use formal phrasing Original: frontier areas like Suggested revision: frontier fields such as Why it matters: This wording identifies academic domains more precisely in formal prose.
- 9. Clarify time frame Original: fosters future economic development Suggested revision: supports long-term economic development Why it matters: “Long-term” states the intended time horizon more naturally than “future.”
- 10. Specify research area Original: research on satellites Suggested revision: research into satellite technology Why it matters: This phrase more precisely describes research into the underlying technology.
- 11. Improve collocation Original: industries Suggested revision: technologies Why it matters: Research lays foundations for technologies more naturally than for “industries” in this sentence.
Suggested Rewrites
- access barriers barriers to access
- wasted taxpayer money wasted taxpayers' money
- accessibility access
- hinders the wider societal benefit limits the broader societal benefits
- fields such as medicine, energy, and the environment fields such as medicine, energy, and environmental science
- proven proved
Why this response received Band 8.5
The response’s strongest feature is its sophisticated, fully developed argument, which evaluates shortcomings before convincingly establishing the wider value of scientific research. Its main limitation is that the case against research is somewhat more general and hypothetical than the benefits discussion. The highest-priority improvement is to support that counterargument with a more concrete example and slightly qualify broad claims about low-value theoretical work.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The essay presents a clear, consistent degree of disagreement and develops both the acknowledged drawbacks and the overriding benefits in depth.
Strengthen the counterargument with one concrete example of demonstrably poor research prioritisation rather than a hypothetical category.
Coherence and Cohesion
Information is sequenced with excellent control, and cohesive links guide the reader naturally within and between well-shaped paragraphs.
Refine the second paragraph by making the relationship between resource misallocation and restricted access even more explicit.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is wide, precise, and skilfully adapted to the topic, with sophisticated phrasing used naturally throughout.
Maintain this precision while replacing the few broad labels, such as ‘obscure theoretical fields,’ with more carefully qualified wording.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response displays full control of varied complex structures, punctuation, agreement, and clause relationships throughout.
Preserve this level of accuracy while continuing to vary sentence openings and syntactic emphasis for an even more individual style.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people say that a lot of scientific research done today is a waste of time and money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.