Some businesses prohibit smoking in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right course of action?
Sample Response
Smoking has been prohibited in some workplacesinside some companies whereas in a few countrieswhereas in few countries it has been totally banned in all public placesall the public places. It is agreed that this is an appropriate action because serious consequences of smoking in working areas and in public may lead to fire accidents and heath hazards to self and society.
A strong argument can be madecould be put forth that smoking should not be allowed in certain work environments. For instance, if there is a lapse in safetya lapse of security in an oil and natural gas company like Indian Oil Corporation, then it has to face the ramifications since the risk of firesprobability for fire accidents becomes higher. Therefore, the ban imposedSo the ban imposed is considered to be an appropriate measurea right method not only to prevent resources from being destroyedthwart the resources from being depleted but also to save workers' livesthe lives of the workers from such a disasterfrom such disaster.
Moreover, if smoking is banned in all public places inof the country then public healththen obviously the overall health of the masses would be improved. Since smoking becomes a legal offenceSince it becomes a legal issue, if they disobey the rules, people might gradually become less dependent on nicotinede-addicted. For exampleillustration, my uncle decided not to smoke in public places such as bus stopspublic amenities like bus stops and railway stations instead of paying a large finea huge amount of fine. Naturally, life-threatening diseases such aslife-threatening diseases like lung cancer and asthma could become less commoncould reduce and the number of passive smokers might also decline. Eventually, the future citizens of the country are made healthier which would be reflected as their efficiency, productivity and enthusiasm thereby paving way for the country's development.
In conclusion, banning smoking either in business sectors or all public places, both are undeniably a wise remedial act because the job environment is made safer and the people are encouraged to lead a healthy lifestyle which in turn contributes to the overall growth of the country. Though smokeless future seems to be skeptical but it could be made possible with joint efforts of all the individuals.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response maintains a clear agreement and develops two relevant lines of support: preventing workplace fires and improving public health, both illustrated with concrete examples. Its main limitation is that some causal claims are overstated or imprecise, especially the suggestion that public-place bans directly eliminate addiction or quickly reduce disease. Prioritise a more accurate explanation of how restrictions reduce second-hand smoke exposure and discourage consumption over time.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A consistent position is supported by relevant workplace-safety and public-health arguments, though a few consequences are asserted too strongly.
Explain the mechanisms of reduced exposure and deterrence accurately, and acknowledge that bans complement rather than replace addiction treatment.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay is clearly paragraphed and progresses logically from workplace safety to public health and conclusion, with generally effective linking.
Tighten the final paragraph so it synthesises the two arguments without adding a loosely connected claim about national development.
Lexical Resource
There is a good range of vocabulary for safety, health, regulation, and economic development, but several collocations and word choices are unnatural or inaccurate.
Use natural terms such as fire risk, protect resources, quit smoking, public spaces, second-hand smoke, and health outcomes.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Varied complex structures convey the argument effectively, but article, agreement, clause-linking, and modifier errors recur without usually obstructing meaning.
Review paired structures and dependent clauses, especially constructions using not only, since, though, and which.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some businesses prohibit smoking in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right course of action?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.