Scientists contribute more to society, so science students should get more support. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sample Response
Science is the backbone of technological developments that has helped in human dominance in the world. It is true that the government and authorities have not provided any extra incentives or scholarship to the science students. In my opinion, the government should provide extra benefits to science students.
To commence with, scientists and researchers are the people who dedicated their life for the society. Firstly, they are the people who work hard to discover new technologies, medicines and the like by neglecting their family life. As everyone knows a scientist’s life is full of stress and tension, most of the intelligent youngsters have a reluctant mind to become a scientist or researcher.
Furthermore, scientists are the boons to humanity. In this modern world, most of the essential problems can be solved with a mouse click ranging from e-banking to telemedicine. Moreover, Computers, televisions and mobile phones have made human life easier, faster and efficient.
On the contrary, there are thousands of students who do not have the basic facility and money to complete their elementary education which is quite necessary for the development of the country and individual. There is an army of people asserts that 100% literacy rate should be the primary goal of a country and illiterate need to get more support. In this regards, providing extra facilities to the science students only might seem a discriminating idea.
To recapitulate, scientists’ contribution towards society and to the world is invaluable so the science students deserve more favourable support from the government, these supports can attract more students towards this field.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Fix subject agreement Original: has Suggested revision: have Why it matters: The plural noun “developments” requires the plural verb “have.”
- 2. Clarify the actors Original: the government and authorities Suggested revision: governments and other authorities Why it matters: This phrasing distinguishes governments from the broader group of authorities.
- 3. Use plural noun Original: scholarship Suggested revision: scholarships Why it matters: A general reference to these benefits requires the countable noun in the plural.
- 4. Remove unnecessary article Original: to the science students. Suggested revision: to science students. Why it matters: No definite article is needed when referring to science students generally.
- 5. Fix tense and number Original: who dedicated their life Suggested revision: who dedicate their lives Why it matters: The general statement needs present tense and a plural noun matching “scientists and researchers.”
- 6. Fix preposition Original: for the society Suggested revision: to society Why it matters: The natural construction is “dedicate their lives to society.”
- 7. Fix article and number Original: the boons to humanity Suggested revision: a boon to humanity Why it matters: “Boon” takes the singular article in this predicate construction.
- 8. Use precise wording Original: most of the essential problems Suggested revision: many everyday problems Why it matters: “Essential problems” is an unnatural collocation for the practical difficulties described.
- 9. Fix capitalization Original: Computers Suggested revision: computers Why it matters: A common noun after the introductory adverb should not be capitalized.
- 10. Keep comparison parallel Original: easier, faster and efficient Suggested revision: easier, faster and more efficient Why it matters: All three coordinated adjectives should use the same comparative form.
- 11. Fix noun form Original: basic facility and money Suggested revision: basic facilities or enough money Why it matters: The general count noun should be plural, and “enough” clarifies the financial shortage.
- 12. Complete noun phrase Original: development of the country and individual Suggested revision: development of both the country and the individual Why it matters: The paired singular nouns need determiners and a clearer correlative structure.
Suggested Rewrites
- has have
- the government and authorities governments and other authorities
- scholarship scholarships
- to the science students. to science students.
- who dedicated their life who dedicate their lives
- for the society to society
Why this response received Band 6.5
The response maintains a clear view that science students deserve additional support and considers the competing priority of basic education, giving the discussion useful balance. Its main limitation is that the central link between supporting students now and producing future social benefits remains asserted rather than demonstrated, while language errors recur. The highest-priority improvement is to propose specific forms of support and explain how each would increase socially valuable scientific work.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear position and relevant counterargument are presented, but the reasons are broad and the case for supporting current science students is only partly developed.
Explain how scholarships, laboratory access, or research placements would attract capable students and lead to measurable public benefits.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay progresses clearly from the position through supporting reasons and a counterargument to the conclusion, though linking is formulaic.
Connect the technology examples directly to the preceding claim and avoid using a separate paragraph for a loosely developed point.
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary is adequate for education and science, but frequent awkward collocations and inaccurate forms reduce precision.
Use natural phrases such as dedicate their lives, reluctant to pursue science, benefit to humanity, and discriminatory policy.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Meaning is generally clear, but agreement, article, plural, preposition, and sentence-boundary errors occur regularly.
Proofread each clause for a clear subject and verb, and separate the two independent clauses in the conclusion.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Scientists contribute more to society, so science students should get more support. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.