Some people say that air travel is one of the main reasons for increased environmental pollution. Should we reduce the number of tourist flights in order to reduce pollution? What is your viewpoint on this issue?

Sample Response

1

Pollution is one of the most serious threatsone of the serious threats that has a pernicious influencewhich have pernicious influences on our environment and people. It is a common and widely discussed debate over whetherissue of whether we should reduce the number of tourist flights to reduce pollution. This essay examines the pros and conscones of this and draws a reasonable conclusion.

2

On the one hand, there are some strong grounds for supporting the proposal to reducegrounds to support the opinion of reducing the number of tourist flights to control air pollution. Firstly, air flights not only causes air pollution, but it also contributes to noise pollution. Hence it affects the environment as well as people at the same time. Another important point is thatAnother important reason is- it is not always income-generating, because it depends on the seasonwhile it depends on seasons and it may lead to economiceconomical losses.

3

On the other hand, it is fairly easy to understand the reasons for not reducing tourist flights with a view to controlling pollutionwith the view of pollution control. Firstly, it is not the only cause of pollutionit is not only the reason for pollution. Also, reducingAlso reducing tourist flights does not have an impact on pollution. Instead, we could adoptHowever, we adopt other possible strategies to limit pollution. Primarily, we should develop technologies to build cleaner aircraftneat and clean flights particularly by using technologyespecially with any technology to limit carbon emissionscap the carbon emission which is the prime cause of air pollution. Secondly, we can alter the schedule and number of tourist flights. To make this clearer, we could arrangeTo make it clearer, arrange these flights in such a way that they could reduce financial lossesit could reduce financial loss. Thus we can arrange more flights in the appropriate seasons with suitablecorrect destinations.

4

To conclude, when we analyse the different aspects, it is proved beyond doubt that we should not reduce the number of tourist flights but rather arrange themrather arrange in a systematic and accessible way to strengthen the national economyto increase national economy. The government should implement better strategies to boost our prosperity.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 6.0

The response gives a clear view against reducing tourist flights and uses a recognisable two-sided structure, with cleaner aircraft offered as a relevant alternative. However, the environmental reasoning is thin and sometimes contradictory, while seasonal profitability and national prosperity distract from the pollution question. The highest-priority improvement is to compare flight reductions with cleaner aviation technology using specific evidence about emissions, keeping every supporting point focused on environmental outcomes.

Band score breakdown

IELTS Writing Criteria Scores

TR

Task Response

5.5
Scoring rule

The response addresses both positions and reaches a clear conclusion, but several points are underdeveloped, partly irrelevant, or unsupported by coherent environmental reasoning.

Next step

Explain why cleaner technology would reduce pollution more effectively than fewer flights, and remove claims concerned only with seasonal revenue.

CC

Coherence and Cohesion

6.0
Scoring rule

The paragraph structure and overall progression are clear, although mechanical sequencing, vague references, and abrupt logical shifts weaken cohesion within the body paragraphs.

Next step

Give each body paragraph one environmental claim and link every subsequent sentence through an explicit cause-and-effect relationship.

LR

Lexical Resource

6.0
Scoring rule

The response uses a sufficient range of environmental and economic vocabulary, but inaccurate spelling, collocation, and word choice recur.

Next step

Replace expressions such as pros and cones, economical losses, and neat and clean flights with precise academic alternatives.

GRA

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

5.5
Scoring rule

Simple and complex structures are attempted, but frequent agreement, article, punctuation, and clause-construction errors reduce control and occasionally obscure relationships.

Next step

Check every complex sentence for a complete main clause and correct agreement before adding linking words or additional clauses.

Put the feedback to work

Write this task while it is fresh

Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.

IELTS Writing Task 2

Some people say that air travel is one of the main reasons for increased environmental pollution. Should we reduce the number of tourist flights in order to reduce pollution? What is your viewpoint on this issue?

Your response

Words0
40:00

Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.