When we meet someone for the first time, we generally decide very quickly what kind of person we think they are and if we like them or not. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
This response is estimated at Band 6.5. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
When we meet someone for the first time, we often form rapid assessmentsdecide quickly if we like them or not. Some people think this is helpful, while others think it is not. In my opinion, this can be both good and bad, but it is more negative.
On the one hand, making a quick judgmentjudgement can save time. For example, if a person is approachable and courteousfriendly and polite, we may feel comfortable talking to them. In some situations, such as a job interview or meeting a new classmate, a good first impression can help people communicate more easily. FurthermoreAlso, our experience sometimes helps us notice if a person may be dishonest or dangerous.
On the other hand, first impressions are not always correct. People may feel nervous when meeting someone for the first time, so they may look unfriendly or quiet. However, after spending more time together, we may find that they are warm and cooperativekind and helpful. If we judge people too quickly, we may lose the chance to make good friends or work well with others.
In conclusion, although first impressions can be useful in some situations, I believe they are often not accurate. We should spend more time getting to know people before deciding what kind of person they are.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The candidate addresses all parts of the prompt and presents a clear position throughout the essay. However, the ideas could be developed with more depth and specific examples to achieve a higher band score.
To improve, expand on the examples. Instead of just stating that a person might look unfriendly, explain how this affects long-term social or professional dynamics in more detail.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay is well-structured with clear paragraphing and logical progression. Cohesive devices are used naturally, though some transitions are slightly repetitive.
Vary the transition signals. Instead of relying solely on 'On the one hand / On the other hand', try 'While there are clear benefits to rapid assessment, the drawbacks are often more significant'.
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary is accurate and appropriate for the task, but it is somewhat basic. There is a lack of less common lexical items or idiomatic expressions that would elevate the score.
Incorporate more sophisticated vocabulary related to psychology and social interaction, such as 'cognitive bias', 'snap judgements', 'preconceived notions', or 'subconscious assessment'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The grammar is highly accurate with very few errors, but the sentence structures are relatively simple. There is a need for more complex sentence patterns to demonstrate higher grammatical range.
Incorporate complex structures such as conditional sentences, relative clauses, and passive voice to show a wider grammatical range.