The diagrams below show a comparison between two road tunnels in two Australian cities.
This response is estimated at Band 9.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
The diagrams illustrate two road tunnels constructed in different Australian cities, showing their respective construction timelines, financial outlays, physical dimensions, geology, cross-sectional configurations, and surfaceconfigurations and surface environments.
Overall, Tunnel B is substantially longer, deeper, and considerablylonger, deeper and considerably more expensive than Tunnel A. While both tunnels employ a twin-tube design, Tunnel B accommodates more lanes per tube and was excavated through stone and clay as opposed to sand.
Tunnel A was delivered between 1997 and 2002, entailing an expenditure of $555 million. It stretches 2.2 kilometres and descends to a maximum depth of 15 metres in a layer of sandbeneath sand. Tunnel B, by contrast, was constructed between 2002 and 2006was completed from 2002 to 2006 at a cost of $1.1 billion, covers a distance of 3.6 kilometres, and reaches a depth of 25 metres throughreaches 25 metres through stone and clay. Although both feature a twin-tube structure,Both convey bidirectional traffic via a twin-tube arrangement, yet Tunnel A carries two lanes per tube whereas Tunnel B carries three.
Above ground, Tunnel A passes beneath a river spanned by a suspension bridgebridge with visible towers, whereas Tunnel B runs underneath a built-up urban zone flanked by multi-storey buildings.
Why this response received Band 9.0
The essay presents an outstanding overview and meticulous detailed comparison of both road tunnels, fully addressing all key features from the visual prompt. The information is logically structured with fluent cohesion, an advanced range of vocabulary, and flawless grammatical structures. To maintain this high standard, continue practicing precise data synthesis under timed conditions.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Achievement
All key features, data points, and structural differences between the two tunnels are accurate, fully reported, and seamlessly compared.
Maintain this level of accuracy and thoroughness by ensuring all visual details are categorized logically in future responses.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response is exceptionally well-organized with clear paragraphing, natural transitions, and effortless logical flow.
Continue employing diverse cohesive devices naturally to connect comparison points without overusing repetitive linking phrases.
Lexical Resource
A sophisticated and highly flexible vocabulary is utilized with complete precision regarding technical and comparative descriptions.
Sustain this accurate use of advanced topic-specific terminology and formal collocations.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The writing demonstrates complete control over a wide variety of complex grammatical structures with no noticeable errors.
Keep utilizing complex sentence forms confidently while ensuring flawless agreement and punctuation.