The chart below shows attendance by age group at three types of music events in Australia in 2006.
This response is estimated at Band 6.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
The bar chart Deletebelow compares the percentage of attendance by age in Australia including 3 types ofpf music events in 2006.
In general, people aged 15-24, 25-34 and 35-44 had the highest attendance rates for popular musicaccounted for the highest proportions of popular music and people aged 45-54 and 55+ were mostly attracted by opera. Additionally, the gap between people aged 45-54 and 55+ was small, while the differences among younger age groups were much wider.while other groups were much wider.
Upon closer inspection, it is noticeable that the percentage of attendance for popular music stood at 38% among people aged 15-24, which was the most popular genrepopular music type among these three typesthis 3 types of music. Similarly, it was also the most popularfavourable music type for people aged 25-34 and 35-44, with attendance rates of 27% and 33% respectivelywhich the attendance rates were 27% and 33% respectively. By contrast, the percentage of attendanceattendence for popular music among people aged 45-54 was muchquite lower, at 13%.And people aged 55+ only have 5%.
Equally noteworthynoteworthly is the fact that the attendance rate of opera among people aged 35-44 ranked first, at about 25%. People aged 45-5455 and 55+ were lower , at 15% eachwhich were equally 15%. People aged 25-34 and 15-24 accounted for 14% and 13% respectively. Meanwhile, classical musicAnd classical music was the least popular genreleast attraction music, whose attendance rates were under 12%which attendance rates was under 12% among all age groupsall kinds of people.
Why this response received Band 6.0
文章能够对图表的主要趋势和具体数据进行基本的描述与比较，涵盖了大部分关键信息。然而，文章存在部分数据理解偏差（如概述中对45岁以上人群偏好的总结不够准确）以及较多的语法和标点拼写错误。建议仔细核对数据细节，并着重提升关系代词使用与句式结构的准确性。
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
任务完成度
文章总结了主要特征并提供了具体数据支持，但总结段中关于45岁以上人群最偏好歌剧的表述不够完全准确（45-54岁组中歌剧与流行乐数据较为接近且并非绝对主导）。
在撰写概述（Overview）时，应更精准地归纳宏观趋势，避免对局部数据过度概括而产生误导。
连贯与衔接
文章结构清晰，分段合理，并使用了一些连接词来组织对比逻辑，但个别连接词和段落过渡不够自然。
尝试使用更多样且自然的衔接词汇，并确保各段落之间的逻辑递进关系更加严密。
词汇资源
词汇量足以满足描述图表的基本需求，但在拼写（如 attendence）及词汇搭配方面偶有疏漏。
加强对学术类图表常用词汇及固定搭配的积累，并在写完后仔细检查拼写。
语法多样性与准确性
出现较多语法错误，包括定语从句关系代词误用（如 which the attendance rates）、主谓一致以及标点格式错误（如句号后缺少空格）。
重点复习定语从句的引导词用法，并注意句法结构的完整性与标点规范。