The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
This response is estimated at Band 8.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
The line charts indicate how the number of train passengers varied in an unspecified geographical location, as well as revealing the proportion of trains running punctually compared to the fixed target of 95%. All the statistics are recorded for the period from 2000 to 2009.
OverallFrom a quick glance, the number of train passengers underwent considerable fluctuation, reaching a peak in 2005. Meanwhile, the rate of trains running on time followed a broadly similar trendshared the same statistical progression, meeting or exceeding the target from 2002 to 2005 and again from 2008 to 2009.
In 2000, the number of travelers using trains was around 36 million37 million, climbing to around 42 million before dropping to just below its starting number in 2003. Over the next two yearsDuring the next years, the number of train passengers rose sharplytrain passengers rose sharply and hit the most significant peak of around 47 million in 2005; afterwards, the figure was somewhat unsteady, reachingending up staying at around 41-42 millionaround 43 million at the end of the period.
In terms of running time efficiency, the rate stood at 92% within the year 2000, subsequently amounting to the target level of 95%an adequate 95% in 2002. In the later years, the proportion of on-time trains exceeded the set target when the rate was 96% in 2004, but later declined notably by 4% in 2006. However, the percentage of punctual trains went up gradually and eventually stabilized at 97%.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The report effectively highlights key features and trends across both line graphs, presenting a clear summary supported by relevant data points. Paragraph structure and logical ordering are strong, allowing the information to flow naturally. To improve further, ensure absolute precision in overview generalization and refine minor word choices for a completely natural tone.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Achievement
Key trends and major features for both graphs are clearly reported, supported by accurate figures from the data.
Ensure the overview details are fully accurate, noting that punctuality dipped back below the 95% target in 2005.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response is logically organized into distinct paragraphs with clear progression throughout.
Vary cohesive markers slightly to avoid overusing introductory time phrases across consecutive paragraphs.
Lexical Resource
A wide variety of topic-specific vocabulary and flexible rephrasing are used effectively.
Refine subtle word collocations, such as replacing 'amounting to an adequate 95%' with 'reaching the target of 95%'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A broad range of complex sentence structures is produced with consistently high accuracy.
Maintain complete precision in participle clauses and prepositional combinations in dynamic sentences.