Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery. However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
This response is estimated at Band 8.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
The assertion that improved fertilizers and machinery have led to more cost-effective food production is indisputable, but the nuanced evaluation of the associated risks is imperative. The transformative impact of cutting-edge technologies on agriculture is undeniable, resulting in unprecedented yields and greater economic efficiencyeconomic efficiencies. However, the serious consequences forprofound consequences on human health and local communities require careful considerationnecessitate a meticulous analysis of the trade-offs.
ImprovedEnhanced fertilizers and pesticides have undoubtedly been instrumental in achieving higher crop yields, but a drawback of this progressthe dark side of this progress lies in the riskspotential threats to public health. The pervasive use of chemical inputs has raised seriousalarming concerns about the accumulation of chemical residues in foodresidues in food items, with potential long-term effects on human healthrepercussions on human well-being. Rigorous monitoring and regulatory frameworks are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure the sustainability of modern agricultural practices.
Simultaneously, the mechanization of farming operations, while boosting efficiency, has createdbrought forth complex social and environmental challenges. The decline of traditional agricultural practices and the displacement of small-scale farmersThe displacement of traditional agricultural practices and small-scale farmers is a stark reality, leading to economic disparities and cultural disruptions. The pursuit of economic gains should be coupled with a commitment to sustainable practices that prioritize environmental conservation and the welfare of local communities.
In conclusion, the economic benefits of advanced fertilizers and machinery are undeniable, but the pursuit of progress should be tempered with a conscientious effort to address and mitigate the potential adverse effects on human health and local societies.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response is strongest in its controlled, sophisticated language and clear progression from economic benefits to health and community risks. Its main limitation is that it falls slightly below the required length and relies on broad assertions rather than fully substantiated evidence. The highest priority is to add a concise, concrete example or explanation for each adverse effect while stating the degree of agreement more explicitly.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A consistent qualified agreement addresses the benefits and both stated risks, but the slightly short response limits the depth of support.
State the extent of agreement directly and add specific evidence showing how chemical residues and mechanization affect people and communities.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay is logically sequenced, appropriately paragraphed, and smoothly connected, with each paragraph serving a clear function.
Make the transition from the opening position to the two risk paragraphs even sharper by previewing those two lines of argument explicitly.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is wide, precise, and consistently appropriate, although the dense abstract phrasing occasionally sounds more elaborate than necessary.
Retain the lexical range while replacing a few heavy nominal phrases with more direct wording for greater clarity and naturalness.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex structures is handled with very high accuracy and clear control throughout the response.
Refine sentence rhythm by mixing the controlled complex structures with occasional shorter sentences for emphasis.