Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery. However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Sample Response
The assertion that improved fertilizers and machinery have led to more cost-effective food production is indisputable, but the nuanced evaluation of the associated risks is imperative. The transformative impact of cutting-edge technologies on agriculture is undeniable, resulting in unprecedented yields and economic efficiencies. However, the profound consequences on human health and local communities necessitate a meticulous analysis of the trade-offs.
Enhanced fertilizers and pesticides have undoubtedly been instrumental in achieving higher crop yields, but the dark side of this progress lies in the potential threats to public health. The pervasive use of chemical inputs has raised alarming concerns about the accumulation of residues in food items, with potential long-term repercussions on human well-being. Rigorous monitoring and regulatory frameworks are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure the sustainability of modern agricultural practices.
Simultaneously, the mechanization of farming operations, while boosting efficiency, has brought forth complex social and environmental challenges. The displacement of traditional agricultural practices and small-scale farmers is a stark reality, leading to economic disparities and cultural disruptions. The pursuit of economic gains should be coupled with a commitment to sustainable practices that prioritize environmental conservation and the welfare of local communities.
In conclusion, the economic benefits of advanced fertilizers and machinery are undeniable, but the pursuit of progress should be tempered with a conscientious effort to address and mitigate the potential adverse effects on human health and local societies.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use natural noun form Original: economic efficiencies Suggested revision: greater economic efficiency Why it matters: Efficiency is normally uncountable when describing agriculture's overall productivity.
- 2. Correct collocation Original: profound consequences on Suggested revision: serious consequences for Why it matters: Consequences normally take for when identifying the people or communities affected.
- 3. Reduce inflated phrasing Original: necessitate a meticulous analysis of the trade-offs Suggested revision: require careful consideration Why it matters: The shorter phrase states the same idea more directly.
- 4. Choose precise modifier Original: Enhanced Suggested revision: Improved Why it matters: Improved more naturally describes fertilizers made more effective through technological progress.
- 5. Use academic wording Original: the dark side of this progress Suggested revision: a drawback of this progress Why it matters: Dark side is figurative and less precise than a direct academic term.
- 6. Avoid redundant wording Original: potential threats Suggested revision: risks Why it matters: Risks already conveys that the threats are possible rather than certain.
- 7. Avoid overstatement Original: alarming Suggested revision: serious Why it matters: Serious is a more measured modifier for concerns in academic prose.
- 8. Use precise wording Original: residues in food items Suggested revision: chemical residues in food Why it matters: Naming the residues and using food as an uncountable noun makes the reference more precise.
- 9. Use direct expression Original: repercussions on human well-being Suggested revision: effects on human health Why it matters: This wording is more direct and consistent with the stated public-health concern.
- 10. Use concise verb Original: brought forth Suggested revision: created Why it matters: Created expresses the causal relationship more directly.
- 11. Fix faulty coordination Original: The displacement of traditional agricultural practices and small-scale farmers Suggested revision: The decline of traditional agricultural practices and the displacement of small-scale farmers Why it matters: Practices can decline while people can be displaced, so each noun needs its appropriate head.
- 12. Sentence rewrite Original: The assertion that improved fertilizers and machinery have led to more cost-effective food production is indisputable, but the nuanced evaluation of the associated risks is imperative. Suggested revision: Although improved fertilizers and machinery have made food production more cost-effective, evaluating their associated risks is essential. Why it matters: The rewrite preserves the contrast while reducing abstract and overly absolute phrasing.
Suggested Rewrites
- economic efficiencies greater economic efficiency
- profound consequences on serious consequences for
- necessitate a meticulous analysis of the trade-offs require careful consideration
- Enhanced Improved
- the dark side of this progress a drawback of this progress
- potential threats risks
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response is strongest in its controlled, sophisticated language and clear progression from economic benefits to health and community risks. Its main limitation is that it falls slightly below the required length and relies on broad assertions rather than fully substantiated evidence. The highest priority is to add a concise, concrete example or explanation for each adverse effect while stating the degree of agreement more explicitly.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A consistent qualified agreement addresses the benefits and both stated risks, but the slightly short response limits the depth of support.
State the extent of agreement directly and add specific evidence showing how chemical residues and mechanization affect people and communities.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay is logically sequenced, appropriately paragraphed, and smoothly connected, with each paragraph serving a clear function.
Make the transition from the opening position to the two risk paragraphs even sharper by previewing those two lines of argument explicitly.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is wide, precise, and consistently appropriate, although the dense abstract phrasing occasionally sounds more elaborate than necessary.
Retain the lexical range while replacing a few heavy nominal phrases with more direct wording for greater clarity and naturalness.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex structures is handled with very high accuracy and clear control throughout the response.
Refine sentence rhythm by mixing the controlled complex structures with occasional shorter sentences for emphasis.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery. However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.