Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
This response is estimated at Band 7.5. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Some languages are disappearing each year due to the growing dominance of international languages. While this phenomenon has some negative consequences according to some, I believe that it ultimately makes life easier and more convenient. This essay will argue in favour of the statement that the extinction of some minority languagessome very minor languages is not a majorbig concern, and our liveslife would be easier if we had fewer languages.
To begin with, having fewer languages will enhance global communication and social interaction. If people spokespeak a common language, they would no longer need to learn multiple languages or struggle with language barriers when travelling, working, or studying abroad. This would significantly improve people's ability to interactsocialize and interact with people of different nationalitiesindividuals from different nationalities. For example, English, widely recognized as an international language, enables people to communicate effectively on social mediasocial media platforms, allowing them to exchange ideas and engage in global discussions without linguistic difficulties.
Additionally, the use of a common language can reduce discrimination between social and cultural groupssocial and cultural discrimination. When people share a single language, they can maintain relationships more easily, regardless of nationality, race, religion, or economic background. For instance, in England, where English is the dominant language, there is relatively little social division based on language. In contrast, India, with its vast number of regional languages, experiences significant cultural and social disparities between different linguistic groups. By unifying people through language, societies can foster a greater sense of community and national identity.
In conclusion, while the decline of linguistic diversity may pose challenges for cultural preservation, it also offers significant advantages in terms of improved global communication and social unity. Therefore, we should not be overly concernedshould not be too much concerned about disappearing languagesthe disappearing languages as fewer languages will make life and communication easier.
Why this response received Band 7.5
The response presents a consistent position in a clearly organised essay, with fluent discussion of communication and social unity. Its main limitation is that key support, especially the England–India comparison, relies on broad claims rather than carefully justified evidence; the highest-priority improvement is to develop more precise causal reasoning and directly address the cultural cost of language loss before rebutting it.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response answers the question directly, maintains a clear position, and develops two relevant reasons with examples.
Strengthen the argument by examining the cultural consequences of language loss and supporting comparisons with more credible, specific reasoning.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas progress logically through a clear introduction, focused body paragraphs, and a conclusion, with cohesive links used effectively.
Make transitions less formulaic by linking each paragraph more explicitly to the central claim and to the preceding reasoning.
Lexical Resource
A varied and generally precise vocabulary supports discussion of communication, linguistic diversity, discrimination, and cultural preservation.
Refine awkward or overly broad word choices such as references to minor languages and social discrimination to improve precision and tone.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex structures is used accurately, and the few errors do not impede meaning.
Check conditional consistency and natural phrasing in constructions such as the hypothetical sentence about people speaking a common language.