In modern society, it is no longer necessary to slaughter animals for producing foodstuffs, or non-food products such as clothes or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample Response

1

In an era of growing public concern over animal conservation, whether animals should be killed to produce food, clothing, and medicinefood, clothing and medicine has sparked considerablefierce debate. From my perspective, slaughtering animals for human needs can be justified, though this practice must be subject to strict regulation.

2

First and foremost,Admittedly, animal‑sourced products bring tangible benefits to human welfare. Meat, for example, contains high levels of protein, an essential nutrient for muscle and bone development. Without adequate protein from livestock, people become more vulnerable to a range of health conditions. Strict vegetarian diets, for instance, may carry unforeseen long‑term risks to human metabolismhuman metabolic functions. Moreover, some vital medicines rely on compounds harvested from animal organs or blood, and these remain irreplaceable therapies for specific medical conditions.

3

On the other hand,That said, scientific progress has enabled many medications to be chemically synthesisedsynthesised chemically in laboratoriespharmaceutical facilities or derived from plant sources, offering alternatives to animal‑based drugs. Furthermore, killing animals for clothing is ethically indefensible. Modern textile manufacturing can produce synthetic fabrics that outperform animal‑derived materials in practical attributesqualities such as wrinkle‑resistance and washability. Demand for fur and leather often stems from human vanity, as consumers seek to display social status through luxury apparelluxury animal‑skin garments. Beyond ethical concerns, biodiversity underpins stable ecosystems. Should one species be driven to extinction, ripple effects across food chains couldcan trigger irreversible ecological damage, ultimately endangering human survival.

4

In conclusion, the regulated slaughter of animalscontrolled animal slaughter for food and indispensable medicines is acceptable, but the production of animal‑sourced clothing is no longer justifiableought to be prohibited in the interests of long‑term ecological balance.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 8.0

The essay presents a well-developed and nuanced argument that directly addresses all parts of the prompt with clear progression and strong supporting ideas. The vocabulary is precise and natural, while grammatical control is consistently accurate throughout. To enhance the overall response further, deepen the critique of plant-based food alternatives to directly address the prompt's premise regarding modern technology.

Band score breakdown

IELTS Writing Criteria Scores

TR

Task Response

8.0
Scoring rule

The response presents a clear, nuanced position that addresses food, medicine, and clothing comprehensively.

Next step

Engage more directly with modern technology claims regarding food substitutes to strengthen the counterargument.

CC

Coherence and Cohesion

8.0
Scoring rule

Information and ideas are organized logically with clear paragraphing and cohesive transitions throughout.

Next step

Ensure cohesive devices between contrastive ideas flow seamlessly without relying on standard discourse markers.

LR

Lexical Resource

8.0
Scoring rule

A wide range of sophisticated vocabulary is used flexibly and accurately to convey precise meanings.

Next step

Continue incorporating natural academic collocations to maintain sophisticated tone consistency.

GRA

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

8.0
Scoring rule

A broad variety of complex sentence structures is used with full control and negligible error.

Next step

Maintain this high level of structural variety while integrating complex conditional or concessive clauses.

Put the feedback to work

Write this task while it is fresh

Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.

IELTS Writing Task 2

In modern society, it is no longer necessary to slaughter animals for producing foodstuffs, or non-food products such as clothes or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Your response

Words0
40:00

Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.