Some people think men and women have different natural abilities that make them suitable for different types of work. Others, however, believe that both men and women can be equally suited to do any type of work. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
This response is estimated at Band 6.5. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Whether natural aptitude should determine the kind of work both men and women should do or they are capable of doing the same type of work is somewhat controversial and require thorough discussion. This essay will explain both aspects. However, I believe that men and women are equally qualifiedboth genders are qualified to meet the same challengestake the same challenge and are capable of doing similar jobs. From one perspective, women are generally considered physically weaker than men and hence less suitable for jobs that require physical force and strengthferocity and physical power. Men, on the other hand, are meant to provide and protect their wives and the entire family and earn athe living. Secondly, women's caring nature and tendernessthe caring nature and tender heart that women possess make them better suited to certain careersmake them more capable of certain careers. This means they generally perform better in occupations that require patience, care, and kindnesspatience, caring and kind heart such as nursing, social workworks and teaching. From the otheropposite perspective, modern society does not discriminate by gender and offersmodern society does not discriminate against genders and offer any type of work to both men and womenboth male and female because of greater fairness and social progressdue to its fairness and advancements. Women and men who go to the same university and completetake the same training programmes are equally prepared to dotake a job. Again, the traditional idea that women will take care of their children while men will earn the living is changing and a reverse scenario could be seen in many families. Finally, women, in almost all fields, have already shownproved that they can perform as wellgood as men if they are given the opportunity. So there is no way we can doubt their capabilitiesundermine their capability. In conclusion, although being naturally endowed may be beneficial for both genders in some situations, it is not particularly needed in the workplaceat workplaces. Learning and training are indispensable for men and women in any society to do the same jobswork for the same jobs.
Why this response received Band 6.5
The response clearly discusses both views and maintains a definite opinion, with relevant reasons about physical differences, caring roles, training, and changing family patterns. Its main limitation is presentation: the entire discussion forms one block, while several awkward collocations and grammatical slips reduce precision. The priority is to divide the argument into purposeful paragraphs and refine inaccurate expressions so each perspective is easier to follow.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both perspectives are addressed and the writer's opinion is clear throughout, although some claims rely on broad generalisations rather than detailed support.
Support each view with a concrete example and qualify sweeping claims about gender roles and natural abilities.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument has a clear internal sequence and useful signposting, but the absence of paragraph breaks weakens organisation and readability.
Use separate introduction, viewpoint, counter-viewpoint, and conclusion paragraphs, each centred on one controlling idea.
Lexical Resource
There is a good range of topic vocabulary, though several choices and collocations are awkward or inaccurate.
Replace imprecise phrases such as take the same challenge and work for the same jobs with natural, exact alternatives.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses varied complex sentences and generally communicates clearly, despite recurring errors in agreement, articles, and comparative forms.
Proofread systematically for subject-verb agreement, countable nouns, articles, and forms such as as well as.