The government should allocate more funding to teaching science rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?
This response is estimated at Band 7.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
People have different views on the subjects that the government should invest in and prioritise to achieveprioritise, to achieve economic developmentwhat is termed economic development. Some believe that a larger share of government fundinga larger portion of government funds should be dedicated to teaching science-related subjectsteaching science-related. In my opinion, although science plays a majorlarge role, other subjects are valuable in their own righthold merit in their own right in contributing to and drivingin contributing to, and in driving, economic progress and therefore deserveeconomic progress and therefore, deserve equal government fundinginvestment and funding.
On the one hand, public funding for science subjectspublic funding in science education subjects plays an important role in drivingis important in driving the development of a country in many areas, such as engineering and medicine. For example, developed countries such as Japan has emphasised the science education of their citizens. This strong focus has led to science learning, knowledge, and scientific research achievement fosters innovation and increases productivity, which directly contributes to the national economic growth of the nation. Therefore, investment in science educationinvestment in the teaching of science education is crucial for a country’s economic progress.
On the other hand, the governance of a nationmanagement of the nation also determines its state of development and economic progress. As such, it can be argued that subjectscurriculum subjects such as social sciences and law require as much attention and investment. For example, developing economies such as Indonesia and Cambodia have long experienced political and social unrest and conflictexperienced a history of political and social unrests and conflicts. We can largely attribute this to instability and poor management of legal, social and governmental systems. This is in contrast to their Asian counterparts such as Singapore and Korea, where well-established and stable civil law and political institutions can be observed.
In conclusion, subjects related to the management of a nation’s economy, such as social sciences, haveeconomy such as social sciences have as much impact and significance on the development of a nationdevelopment and progress of one’s nation and deserve as much government investment as science subjects.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response presents a clear, consistent position and supports it with a balanced explanation of how both scientific and institutional education can advance a country. Its main limitation is that some causal claims and examples are asserted rather than fully explained, while several awkward or inaccurate grammatical constructions reduce precision. The highest-priority improvement is to develop each example’s reasoning more carefully and edit complex sentences for clear subject–verb relationships and natural phrasing.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear and consistent position addresses the task through relevant arguments about science and other fields, although some support is generalized or insufficiently explained.
Explain the causal link between each educational field and national development more precisely, using examples that directly substantiate the claim.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response progresses logically through a balanced four-paragraph structure, with clear central topics and generally effective linking.
Make connections within body paragraphs less formulaic by explicitly showing how each supporting sentence advances the paragraph’s main claim.
Lexical Resource
A broad range of topic-appropriate vocabulary conveys the argument effectively, but several unnatural collocations and redundant expressions reduce precision.
Replace awkward combinations such as references to science education subjects with concise, idiomatic phrasing and remove unnecessary repetition.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses varied complex structures, but recurring agreement problems and malformed clause combinations weaken accuracy and clarity.
Prioritize subject–verb agreement and divide overloaded clause chains into grammatically complete sentences with clearly related subjects and verbs.