Many businesses find it very difficult to assign enough time and resources to research and development. What could a government do to encourage more company spending in this area?
Sample Response
Competition has increased to a greater extent between various organisations. This has forced most of the firms to only concentrate on profits rather than innovations. However, lack of explorations has impacted the growth of the country's economy. In this essay, we will analyse how ruling party can motivate co-operations to invest in the analysis of old products and improve them.
To begin with, the political authority can declare some benefits for those industries which have modified the existing systems for their better performance. For instance, elected group can provide some concessions on the mortgage interest rate for the firms releasing modified merchandises. Evidently, Company will put full efforts on experimenting old product and creating its better version. Thus, it is apparent that this will inspire associations to venture in redeveloping existing applications.
In addition to this, the administration can provide few dedicated staff members for the purpose of creating new better systems from the existing one. A good illustration for this is the group of employees who will be employed on government's payroll but will work for the other companies. In other words, the only aim of these special employees will be improving systems by performing some tests on them. Hence, Company will be able to focus on upgrading applications without compensating their regular profits.
In conclusion, the government can play a vital role in influencing organisations to uplift older systems. What this means is government can provoke industries by offering them lower loan interest rates and committed workforce which will help to boost countries economy. It is thus hoped that ruling parties will implement some measures for instigating company to get involved in new inventions.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use competition collocation Original: increased to a greater extent between Suggested revision: intensified among Why it matters: Competition intensifies “among” multiple organisations.
- 2. Remove unnecessary article Original: most of the firms Suggested revision: most firms Why it matters: A general statement about firms does not require “the.”
- 3. Place only correctly Original: to only concentrate Suggested revision: to concentrate only Why it matters: “Only” should sit next to the element it limits, which is profits.
- 4. Use uncountable innovation Original: innovations Suggested revision: innovation Why it matters: “Innovation” is uncountable when referring to the general activity.
- 5. Use research term Original: lack of explorations Suggested revision: a lack of research Why it matters: “Research” is the relevant activity, whereas “explorations” has a different meaning.
- 6. State negative effect Original: impacted Suggested revision: hindered Why it matters: “Hindered” clearly expresses the claimed negative effect.
- 7. Name government directly Original: the political authority Suggested revision: the government Why it matters: “The government” is clearer and matches the actor named in the task.
- 8. Use incentive collocation Original: declare some benefits Suggested revision: offer incentives Why it matters: Governments offer incentives rather than declare benefits.
- 9. Use correct institution Original: elected group Suggested revision: the government Why it matters: “Elected group” is not a natural term for the public authority described.
- 10. Use business loan term Original: concessions on the mortgage interest rate Suggested revision: reductions in loan interest rates Why it matters: Business investment is supported by loan rates rather than residential mortgage rates.
- 11. Fix product wording Original: modified merchandises Suggested revision: improved products Why it matters: “Merchandise” is uncountable, and “products” fits the development context more precisely.
- 12. Fix number and collocations Original: Company will put full efforts on experimenting old product Suggested revision: Companies will make a concerted effort to improve existing products Why it matters: The plural subject, effort phrase, and infinitive construction are all required here.
Suggested Rewrites
- increased to a greater extent between intensified among
- most of the firms most firms
- to only concentrate to concentrate only
- innovations innovation
- lack of explorations a lack of research
- impacted hindered
Why this response received Band 6.0
The response’s strongest feature is its clear organisation around two government measures, each accompanied by an explanation. The main limitation is that the measures are imprecisely framed: subsidised staff may reduce rather than encourage company spending, while mortgage concessions are not clearly tied to research expenditure. Prioritise proposing direct incentives such as matched grants or tax credits and explaining exactly how they would increase firms’ own investment in research and development.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The essay proposes two relevant forms of government support, but their connection to increased company spending is sometimes indirect and their development is repetitive.
Explain how each incentive is conditional on measurable company research expenditure so it answers the spending requirement directly.
Coherence and Cohesion
The four-paragraph structure and clear sequencing support progression, although mechanical signposting and repeated references to improving old systems limit flexibility.
Use concise topic sentences that distinguish financial incentives from shared research personnel, and remove repetitive closing statements within each paragraph.
Lexical Resource
There is enough vocabulary to discuss government support and product development, but frequent inaccurate substitutions make the wording unnatural or occasionally unclear.
Use precise terms such as “companies,” “research,” “subsidies,” “products,” and “incentivise” instead of “co-operations,” “explorations,” “merchandises,” and “provoke.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response attempts a range of complex sentences, but errors with articles, agreement, plurals, possessives, and capitalisation occur regularly.
Revise noun phrases systematically, adding necessary articles and possessives in forms such as “the government’s payroll” and “the country’s economy.”
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Many businesses find it very difficult to assign enough time and resources to research and development. What could a government do to encourage more company spending in this area?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.