Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
This response is estimated at Band 6.5. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Raising the price of petrol is regarded as the best way to tackle increasingly serious traffic problems and environmental pollution. I tend to disagree with this view.
Admittedly, raising the price of petrol can address these issues. It will reduce the possibility of wasting petrol and overusing cars. For example, if the price of petrol increases, people tend to choose public transport instead of private vehiclespersonal cars. In this sense, it is effective to handle serious traffic problems and environmentalenvironment pollution. However, there will be some drawbacks to increasing petrol priceswith the increase of raising the price of petrol.
Firstly, this policy would have negligible impact onOn the one hand, this solution has little impact on high-income earnershigh income people. To be more specific, this policy is unfair to ordinary citizens. It may create a sense of inequality among the public and damage social cohesion. This method will make private carsmake private cars become a symbol of wealth. Ordinary citizens may lose their freedom to travel by car, because of the prohibitive cost of fuel.because of the high price of fuel. Secondly,On the other hand, another drawback is that it can increase the costs of delivery. On an individual level, this means that people may pay higher delivery fees when shopping online. This directly affects daily life in that the convenience of shopping online.
However, these benefits can be achieved by better alternatives rather than increasing the price of petrol. For example, the government can introducegovernment can introduce laws to limit citizens' purchases oflimit citizens to purchasing petrol each monththe petrol monthly. This will effectively control petrol consumption and tackle serious traffic problems and environmental pollution. Furthermore, upgrading public transport willupgrading the public transportation will encourage more people to choose buses or subways instead of private vehicles. Such as increasing the number of public transportation routes, improving the passenger comfort and cleanlinessinterior conditions and improving the on-time performance.
In conclusion, although raising the price of petrol is useful, these temporary benefits are significantly outweighed by its substantial challenges. Hence, better results can be achieved by upgrading the public transportation and limiting monthly petrol purchaseslimiting petrol purchase monthly.
Why this response received Band 6.5
文章完整回答了题目提出的两个问题，立意清晰且提出了具体的替代方案。然而，文中存在个别句子碎片现象以及对题目核心短语的机械重复。建议加强句式连接的完整性，并丰富同义替换以提升语言表达的多样性与准确度。
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
任务回应
文章明确表达了对汽油涨价作为最佳手段的反对态度，并提出了改善公共交通等有效替代措施。
在论述替代方案时，可以进一步深化对其如何具体解决交通与污染问题的逻辑论证。
连贯与衔接
文章整体结构清晰，分段合理，但存在如“Such as increasing...”等断句不当导致的衔接瑕疵。
注意避免使用以“Such as”开头的独立句子，确保段落间与句子间的衔接自然流畅。
词汇资源
使用了如“social cohesion”和“symbol of wealth”等得体词汇，但部分近义表达重复度较高。
减少对“traffic problems and environmental pollution”等原题词汇的直接重复，多使用同义替换。
语法多样性与准确性
能运用多种句式表达观点，但存在句式结构残缺和介词搭配不当的问题。
检查并修正句子成分缺失（如缺少谓语的碎片句），提高复杂句表达的准确率。